Tj engine question - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ Tech Forum

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on WranglerForum.com
Old 12-02-2012, 02:56 PM   #1
Jeeper
 
doghound93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Delaware
Posts: 393
Tj engine question

What is better for offroading the stock 2.5l or a stock 4.0l just wondering because I have heard the 2.5l has a lot of torque

doghound93 is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-02-2012, 03:48 PM   #2
Jeeper
 
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 768
This is going to open a can..

SeVeReDiStOrTiOn is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-02-2012, 08:14 PM   #3
Jeeper
 
doghound93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Delaware
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeVeReDiStOrTiOn
This is going to open a can..
?
doghound93 is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 09:33 AM   #4
Jeeper
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by doghound93 View Post
?
Of worms......the responses will likely pour in..LOL
__________________
6rings is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 10:16 AM   #5
Jeeper
 
Modestmar97tj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Waterford
Posts: 49
Images: 3
hmm i would think the 4.0 because of higher horse power. seems like more horse power would put out more torque. Based off stock gearing.
Modestmar97tj is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 10:39 AM   #6
Jeeper
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wolf Lake, IL
Posts: 709
Always opt for more available horsepower. It's there when you need it.
JeepnJim is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 10:56 AM   #7
Jeeper
 
Throwmorepartsatit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Carlsbad ca
Posts: 90
Someone told me that the loss of hp is offset by the gearing, the lighter, weight, and the weight being set further back on the 2.5l
Throwmorepartsatit is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 10:57 AM   #8
Jeeper
 
Throwmorepartsatit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Carlsbad ca
Posts: 90
Says the guy with the 2.5l
Throwmorepartsatit is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 11:18 AM   #9
Jeeper
 
UFOtestpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,782
HP= TQ*RPM/5252

HP is a USELESS number, period. Regardless of the application the important data is the slope of the TQ curve, where the peak is in relation to RPM+gearing, and the total area under the TQ curve. Everything else is the wool they pull over your eyes to sell you something.

The "better" engine is the one that gives you what you need, where you need it, for what you use it for.
__________________
For some, it is easier to kill the light inside of themselves than it is to fight the darkness all around them.
UFOtestpilot is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 11:29 AM   #10
Jeeper
 
Dextreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 3,421
Images: 1
The 2.5L is a beast in 4Lo.
__________________
'99 Chilli Pepper TJ Wrangler "Mistress"
33x12.5 DuraTracs
Zone 4.25"
Dextreme is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 11:41 AM   #11
Jeeper
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wolf Lake, IL
Posts: 709
How about a show of hands. Who here with a 4.0 wishes they had a 2.5 instead?
JeepnJim is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 12:13 PM   #12
Jeeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Central PA
Posts: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeepnJim
How about a show of hands. Who here with a 4.0 wishes they had a 2.5 instead?
Lol, easiest way to get an actual answer..
__________________
-Rob

1998 Jeep Wrangler
4.0 : 5 Speed : Green with Black hard top : 33X12.50 Parnelli Jones Dirt Grip's on Eagle Alloy 15x7's : e-AutoGrille's Rock Crawler front bumper with an Engo E9000 with synthetic line
ob269 is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 12:14 PM   #13
Jeeper
 
screwystewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by dextreme
the 2.5l is a beast in 4lo.
x2
screwystewy is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 01:10 PM   #14
Jeeper
 
MOTO X TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: st louis
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by throwmorepartsatit View Post
says the guy with the 2.5l
lol
__________________
2005 LJ
1997 TJ
MOTO X TJ is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 01:19 PM   #15
Jeeper
 
Sherpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lehi, UT
Posts: 1,049
It depends what type of off-roading you do. For mud bogging, you'll want lots of wheel speed and need lots of horsepower, so you wouldn't want anything less than the 4.0L. For general trails and even rock crawling, the 2.5L does very well--partly due to weighing 200 pounds less than an equivalent 4.0L, partly due to its slightly more aggressive axle gearing from the factory.

I have owned multiple examples of both engines, and I have wheeled and rock crawled them all. (I never mud bog.) The only time I have found a 2.5L lacking was when climbing steep hills on the freeway. On the trail, I had no complaints at all about the 2.5L.
__________________
Dempsey Bowling
My fleet: 91 Miata, 98 Wrangler Sport, 06 Mustang GT, 01 Suburban 8.1L, 14 Forte EX
Jeep mods: 4" longarm + 1" BL, 35" KM2s, 4.56s with dual ARBs... and lots of scratched armor
Sherpa is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 01:19 PM   #16
Jeeper
 
Dextreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 3,421
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeepnJim View Post
How about a show of hands. Who here with a 4.0 wishes they had a 2.5 instead?

Hey, the only possible thing worse than owning a 4.0L is getting passed on a trail by 2.5L. Just sayin.



__________________
'99 Chilli Pepper TJ Wrangler "Mistress"
33x12.5 DuraTracs
Zone 4.25"
Dextreme is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 01:54 PM   #17
Jeeper
 
530ktm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,703
Images: 3
4 cylinder geared properly is great for wheeling. The only time you really appreciate the 6 cylinder is highway speeds. I have had both and I need the 6 cylinder for I drive on the highways and also pull a small motorcycle trailer which I would not attempt with a smaller engine.
530ktm is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 12-03-2012, 08:20 PM   #18
Jeeper
 
DeepSouthJeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 1,545
Sure the 2.4/2.5 weighs less, and is cheaper, but if you have the cash I'd say get a 4.0. You may not need the extra power, but it can't hurt.

DeepSouthJeeper is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



logo carid shop wrangler parts carid fender flares custom wheels store avs deflectors at carid
» Rates
Get low rates on auto insurance in Canada!

» Network Links
»Jeep Parts
» Featured Product

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC