CJ 5 '75 3.8 Engine - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > CJ Jeep Forum > CJ Tech Forum

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on WranglerForum.com
Old 07-22-2014, 07:27 AM   #1
Newb
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1
CJ 5 '75 3.8 Engine

Hi, I would like to hear some opinions from you experts .
Considering to get a 3.8 liter 74kw/100hp CJ 5 from 1975. I believe everything on it is original, but some things made me doubt it.

First, I've seen that there is a exhaust under the left side of the jeep, Is it possible that it has arrived this way originally? What do you think of this way of exhaust mount?
Also, I would like to know more about this engine, I see it has pretty low power but If I wont go extreme with it, will it do the job? What about it's durability?

I've found it to be called 232, can someone just confirm that?

Here are some pix exactly of this one I would buy.



itox is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 07-22-2014, 10:31 AM   #2
Jeeper
 
Tahoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 128
Images: 3
The exhaust under the drivers seat is after market, IMO, It should be directed straight out the back. Try to snap some photos of the engine area - exhaust manifold etc.

__________________
1978 CJ-5
Old School Rules

1964 CJ3B
1993 YJ
2002 TJ
Tahoe is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 08-06-2014, 04:39 PM   #3
Jeeper
 
Bbannongmu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 420
100hp sounds about right for a 1975, choked with emissions junk. I had a 1953 M-38A1 (like a CJ5) with a 1963 3.7liter 225 cu inch odd fire V-6 with 160 hp and the exhaust came out the sides because there is no room to run exhaust out the rear, due to the gas tank moved from under the seat to the rear. The exhaust was ok on and off the road. Check the frame for rust thru and check the tub near the wheel wells, seat mounts and tailgate for rust.
Bbannongmu is online now   Quote Quick Reply
Old 08-22-2014, 07:18 PM   #4
Jeeper
 
Phil T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 170
I owned a 1975 CJ5 new. Hard to tell from your photos but the seats and steering wheel don't look stock. The fuel tank was in the back with a skid plate which caused it to rust through for me in 1981!. Exhaust was out the back. 232 was OK in its day but would be way underpowered compared to todays Jeeps.
Phil T is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 09-27-2014, 09:11 AM   #5
Jeeper
 
Mbhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North El Paso county
Posts: 21
I bought new 73 Cj5 with a 304 V8. The 232 was low power. Your seats, exhaust, bumpers and possibly steering wheel large after market. I wouldn't waste time and money on a 232. If you're going to change anyway, go with a 350, future parts are cheap and plentiful.
Mbhale is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




Download our Mobile App

» Network Links
»Jeep Parts
» Featured Product

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC