Does the Use of Stover Type Lock Nuts Change Torque Requirements??? - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > JK Jeep Wrangler Forum > JK General Discussion Forum

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on WranglerForum.com
Old 03-01-2012, 03:05 PM   #1
Jeeper

WF Supporting Member
 
GreenRubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 480
Does the Use of Stover Type Lock Nuts Change Torque Requirements???

This past weekend I was changing out my TB bolts with Grade 8 9/16" bolts, Grade 8 flat washers and Grade 8 Stover lock nuts and a question arose in my mind.

Stover lock nuts work by providing resistant friction via uniquely shaped threads and it takes extra ft/lbs of force just to put them on before you actually tighten and torque them.

My question is, does using Stover type lock nuts change the torque requirements when tightening these nuts down? For example, if it requires an additional 10 ft/lbs of force just to turn a Stover lock nut on a bolt, should my final torque on my TB bolts be 135 ft/lbs instead of 125 ft/lbs?

Do we have any structural engineers on here who can answer this question? Thanks.

__________________
2008 Natural Green JK Rubicon
GreenRubi is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 03-01-2012, 03:41 PM   #2
Jeeper
 
C2U5H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 133
These types of nuts are in a group of lock nuts called "prevailing torque nuts" (also called Autolock nuts, Unitorque nuts, Crownlock nuts, and automation lock nuts). Short answer: no. If the torque specification for a hex nut is 10 ft-lb, the Stover nut will not need additional torque to fully deform the threads (same for a Nylock nut). The additional resistance they have as you tighten or loosen it, called prevailing torque, due to the deformed top threads (or Nylon insert for the Nylock nut) is so small, that you'll be looking at a difference of a few in-lb, or fraction of an in-lb.

I'm a technical writer so I deal with this stuff all day, but didn't actually know the answer. So I ran upstairs and bounced it off a few system and product engineers ($100M+ in sales company).

__________________
2012 CRUSH JK Rubicon
6-Speed, Black Leather, Heated Seats, 430N, Connectivity, Auto AC, Power Convenience, Deep Tint, Trailer Tow, Dual Top
C2U5H is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 03-01-2012, 03:46 PM   #3
Jeeper
 
TOKKIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sonora, CA.
Posts: 414
Check your torque, I think you may have meant in/lbs.
TOKKIE is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 03-01-2012, 04:00 PM   #4
Jeeper

WF Supporting Member
 
GreenRubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 480
Thank for the information C2U5H.
__________________
2008 Natural Green JK Rubicon
GreenRubi is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 03-01-2012, 04:45 PM   #5
Jeeper

WF Supporting Member
 
4Pnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 37
stover nut = a type of prevailing torque nut; provides resistance to loosening.
prevailing torque = the torque required to run the nut down the bolt before clamping force is made.
preload = clamping force of the tightened nut and bolt.


Acceptable torque will nearly always be a range despite values often being specified as a single value.

The prevailing torque of a stover nut will affect the resultant torque and preload as compared to a standard nut though probably not enough to fall outside, or far outside, of the required torque range.

In your application of replacing suspension nuts and bolts the question must be asked, were the original nuts a type of locking nut? The manufacturers torque specification would have accounted for this either way for the original fasteners.

Look at it with extreme numbers. If the prevailing torque of the nut were 100 ft/lbs and the required torque was 125 ft/lbs then your torque wrench would indicate 125 ft/lbs when preload reached a value to add just 25 ft/lbs of additional torque. In other words not tight enough. Again, this is an extreme example but shows how the prevailing torque will affect the resultant effective torque.

If replacing a standard nut with a prevailing torque nut a method of measuring the prevailing torque is to install the nut to near its last turn then measure the prevailing torque using a deflection scale torque wrench. This value can then be added to the torque specification. e.g. if the specification is 125 ft/lbs and it takes 6 ft/lbs to turn the nut, torquing the nut to 131 ft/lbs would give a similar clamping force as a standard nut torqued to 125 ft/lbs.


There are other considerations. Just a couple are: friction coefficient differences due to different coatings, manufacturing lubricants, etc. Unlikely to be significant but measurable variables. Of course the thread pitch must be equivalent as well.

Please read the first two paragraphs again.

I'm not an engineer but I've been doing some reading on the subject. Comments?
__________________
2012 JKU Rubicon: Flame Red, Manual, Max Tow, Dual Top, Supl. Air Bags, Heated Seats, ACE Rock Sliders.
4Pnuts is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 03-01-2012, 05:05 PM   #6
Jeeper

WF Supporting Member
 
GreenRubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 480
Thanks 4Pnuts for the clarification. Makes perfect sense.

On second inspection, the stock nuts appear to also be stover locking nuts, so I imagine Chrysler already accounted for any prevailing torque in their torque specification.

Thanks.
__________________
2008 Natural Green JK Rubicon
GreenRubi is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 03-01-2012, 05:08 PM   #7
Really liking the Jeep...

WF Supporting Member
 
strider_mt2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Southern New Jersey
Posts: 1,956
Interesting question and interesting answers!
I recently ordered a similar kit, but that thought hadn't occurred to me.
Good stuff folks!

__________________
2012 Unlimited Rubicon - Natural Green
Every Day Driver
strider_mt2k is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with the 430N Media Center mslandsurveyor JK General Discussion Forum 5 11-11-2012 06:29 PM
Yet another use for Windshield mounted lights I8up General Jeep Discussion 42 05-22-2012 04:36 PM
New bike carrier... perfect for the JK Ape JK General Discussion Forum 10 05-02-2012 10:42 AM
The UPS guy was just here... :D cavediverjc General Jeep Discussion 37 03-04-2012 12:19 PM
New yj to join the forum. Where are all the marylanders jjusmc77 WF New Member Check In 10 03-02-2012 04:44 PM


» Rates
Get low rates on auto insurance in Canada!

» Network Links
»Jeep Parts
» Featured Product

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC