Which CAI should I get? - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > JK Jeep Wrangler Forum > JK General Discussion Forum

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on WranglerForum.com
Old 06-14-2011, 12:06 PM   #1
Jeeper
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 29
Which CAI should I get?

I can't decide between these two models.

One gives the metal tube, which would look nice for those looking in my engine bay, while the other claims a higher HP gain at 4800RPM (a line I rarely cross).

I'm more interested in the sound of the engine, as well as the higher air flow, rather than the marginal performance increases they give.

K&N 77 Series for JK
K&N 63 Series for JK

77 Said lower HP Gain, but colder air due to metal piping, so likelihood of higher MPG savings. 63 is reported to give a higher HP, at the cost of being less functionally sound for the fuel savings.

Only interested in K&N, have used them on every vehicle I've owned, I trust their products.

Wiltron is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-14-2011, 12:12 PM   #2
Trying to Get Lost

WF Supporting Member
 
jeffk42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 994
Images: 4
Neither will have any effect on HP or MPG, so just get the one that you think looks the nicest.

__________________
2011 Jeep Wrangler Sport S [Photos]


jeffk42 is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-14-2011, 12:15 PM   #3
Jeeper
 
Wallygator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vernon BC
Posts: 1,237
The cold air intake will have no effect on performance and very little on mileage. They are designed for high revving motors. So yeah go with the one that looks nicest
__________________
Hey Y'all! Watch this! I saw it in a movie once!
Wallygator is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-14-2011, 12:22 PM   #4
Jeeper
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 29
How can they give no increase? Everyone I've talked too, including mechanics who work on SUV's and larger trucks, as well as all the reports online all said it increased responsiveness as well as fuel econ?
Wiltron is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-14-2011, 12:27 PM   #5
Trying to Get Lost

WF Supporting Member
 
jeffk42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 994
Images: 4
There are no benefits to putting an intake on a vehicle unless that vehicle has restricted airflow from the factory (many do), which the aftermarket intake alleviates. The Wrangler's airflow isn't really restricted.

All the mechanics that you talked to should be agreeing on this point.
__________________
2011 Jeep Wrangler Sport S [Photos]


jeffk42 is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-14-2011, 12:35 PM   #6
MTH
Fun Killing Ninja
 
MTH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,542
Ran a "title" search in the JK section for the word "intake" and got 43 hits. This gets asked all . . . the . . . time.

But the basics are--as Jeffk42 stated--that the stock intake provides, for the most part, all the air the engine will use during normal operation as currently configured.

Hence, you get only marginal performance increases from simply adding a new intake. While the dyno sheets published by the CAI manufacturers are not fabrications, even they only show three or four more horsepower at common RPMs. Maybe a shade more gas mileage, though I rather doubt that one.

To really capitalize on the whole "air" thing, you'd have to do the whole engine front to back -- new intake, new throttle body, new headers, and a new exhaust. The dynos published by the guys at Ripp show similar set ups netting 20+ horsepower. Might be able to tweak out some more with a custom tune of the computer to capitalize on the extra airflow.

The problem is that's not a very cost effective way to put 20 more hp on the ground. You could regear for less and create more hp at a given speed.

That said, you stated that you're really only interested in the sound. I have an AEM Brute Force along with a viper throttle body and the engine sounds FANTASTIC. It feels as if it's given me a few more horsepower--I'd say less than 10, but that's just a guess.

Here's my intake review and here's my throttle body (*not* a throttle body "spacer") review.
__________________
Mike
2010 JKU "Mountain" Edition
TeraFlex 2.5" Coil Lift : Old Man Emu Nitrocharger Shocks : 33x12.5R15 Goodyear DuraTracs : 15x8 Black Rock 909s : Other Stuff . . .
MTH is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-14-2011, 01:15 PM   #7
Official WF thread de-railer
 
Mr. Sinister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fair Hill, Maryland
Posts: 3,702
Let's approach this logically and scientifically:
The factory airbox, by it's design, is a CAI. The inlet and filter are contained in a box, cut off from underhood heat, right? Right.
An engine only pulls in enough air it needs to operate efficiently, right? Right.
To flow more air, a filter must also allow more dirt to pass, right? Right.
If you increase the diameter of the inlet pipe by using a CAI, you still bottleneck at the throttle body, right? Right.
Metal is an EXCELLENT conductor of heat, right? Right.
If you bring more air into an engine, you need to flow more air out, and increase fuel delivery to compensate for the added air, change your timing, etc. right? Right. There's a little wiggle room on all 3, but like you have seen, in most cases it's peak power, not over the entire powerband. This is why you can't just throw a big honkin' set of headers on a stock motor. You'll lose power by slowing velocity, because the potential volume increased dramatically, without velocity. Velocity is just as important as volume to power and fuel economy. This is why you see longer intake runners used for factory applications, to keep volume and velocity where they need to be on a stock engine, to produce the most useable torque. Your air inlet (CAI) is essentially just an extension of the intake runners. Shortening the intake track raises high rpm power, and also raises the entire useable powerband. There are limitations to both, however. Your runners can be too long or too short, but we won't get into that.

Increasing airflow on an engine that doesn't really need it by increasing the flow through the filter and increasing the diameter of the inlet pipe will net you very little gain, and in fact, may RAISE your peak power rpm, by providing a larger hole to draw air through, slowing velocity and altering your torque curve. Think about how often you're seeing RPM above 4000 on a Wrangler. The couple HP a CAI may provide are not nearly as important as the affect it will have on torque, which is most likely negative in the 3.8's case. Even if you gain a couple ft/lbs of torque, unless it's average and not peak, it's basically useless in our Jeeps.
Higher performance engines often benefit (more so, but still not typically dramatic) from a CAI because the factory air inlet was designed to keep noise down, not make the most power. The 3.8 has been around long enough and used in enough different applications that it's pretty much been optimized. It produced 150hp originally, and now makes 202 in our Wranglers. That's a 52hp increase, while still having to maintain Federal standards. I'd say that's pretty much optimized for a fairly low performance V6.
The most powerful things about these CAI kits are their marketing teams. Until you NEED the added flow, you're basically just wasting money. You might pick up a couple of peak hp, maybe a real 1/2mpg, and a little added noise. So you have to decide if allowing more dirt into your engine and possibly altering your useable powerband is worth the "benefits" and the price.
There are many, many variables here, but basic engine operation is the same.
__________________
My battle with Chrysler over getting my Jeep repaired under warranty: http://www.wranglerforum.com/f33/ins...ml#post3467156
Mr. Sinister is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-14-2011, 01:25 PM   #8
MTH
Fun Killing Ninja
 
MTH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,542
I hear this is a "drop-in" way to increase horsepower and torque significantly. More airflow and such . . . .
__________________
Mike
2010 JKU "Mountain" Edition
TeraFlex 2.5" Coil Lift : Old Man Emu Nitrocharger Shocks : 33x12.5R15 Goodyear DuraTracs : 15x8 Black Rock 909s : Other Stuff . . .
MTH is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-15-2011, 06:53 AM   #9
Jeeper
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 111
I added a K & N 77 Series along with MBPR performance exhausts and Superchips tuner and got more power and better gas mileage. With 33x12.5 Khumo tires on 17 inch wheels before adding the above MPG was 15.1 After the above mods, MPG is now 18.7 and lot's more power as well.
cremaley is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-15-2011, 11:10 AM   #10
Jeeper
 
Wallygator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vernon BC
Posts: 1,237
Probably due more to the exhaust and tuner. My biggest gain was from putting an a better exhuast. Intake did next to nothing. Sounded nice tho.
__________________
Hey Y'all! Watch this! I saw it in a movie once!
Wallygator is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-15-2011, 02:55 PM   #11
Jeeper
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 33
Howdy,
I added a Banks CAI to my Jeep and it is great and really fits into the stock location. As for added power, maybe a little. It does sound good!!!! I did change the oiled filter element for a dry AEM element. There are many experts on here who quote dyno results and really talk the CAI down as a waste. Well, it was my money and I am happy. I dont care what the Einsteins think!!! I would do it all over again!!!!! Have a goodun!!!!
Ol Tex is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-16-2011, 07:48 AM   #12
Jeeper
 
Djstorm100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 757
Increase air flow does not mean increase or decrease in MPG. Air is a dependent variable soley based on the amount of oxygen that is in the air (giving the humity, elevation, and temperature)
Djstorm100 is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 06-16-2011, 08:03 AM   #13
Jeeper
 
thenorsepole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 426
I got the 66 and, performance-wise, I see no substatial difference based on "seat of the pants" technology. I do, however, reset my MPG tracker between oil changes. Prior to the 66 I was averaging 17.3 MPG, Over the last 1500 miles or so I am averaging 18.0.

Is it because of the intake? Oil type? I can't say for certain, but I can say that it does sound much better than with the stock set up.

Even though the intake may not make a significant difference in performance, I don't feel as if I pissed away my money in buying and installing it either.

__________________
Bernie
2011 JK Sport - Black/Black
thenorsepole is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




» Network Links
»Jeep Parts
» Featured Product

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC