Hammer vs Striker fire - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > General Discussion Forums > Off-Topic

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on WranglerForum.com
Old 04-02-2012, 08:31 AM   #1
Jeeper
 
dama417's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wausau WI
Posts: 176
Hammer vs Striker fire

For those of you who were brought up with pistols with hammers how do you feel about the striker fire? My concern is the lack of a manual safety. I also liked having both single and double action. My 92FS Beretta is a little big and heavy, so I've been looking at Glock 26, Springfield XD Compact, S&W M&P Compact or a Ruger SR9C. Ruger and S&W are available with thumb safetys. Opinions please.

dama417 is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 04-02-2012, 09:10 AM   #2
Jeeper
 
commodore_dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 487
I bought a Glock 26 specifically because I didn't want any additional safeties. It's just one more thing to flub in an emergency, I'll take point and shoot any day.

commodore_dude is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Old 04-03-2012, 12:00 AM   #3
Jeeper
 
armygreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 370
hammer or striker doesn't matter to me, it's all the other stuff and how/where i'm going to carry it.

for concealed i want as little bits on the outside of the gun as possible, that could catch on clothing when i attempt to draw in an emergency.

however, that said, i never carried my glock26 with a round in the pipe because it had no safety and the trigger is nearly as short and light as a 1911.

so i replaced the glock26 with a ruger sr9c, which is so very similar in so many ways but has a thumb safety. <-- that's the reason right there. i didn't wanna custom mod the glock to have one.

note however it's thumb safety is kinda small and harder to manipulate under stress as a 1911 safety.

note also it comes with a device that blocks firing if the mag is out or simply isn't seated; this is an easy removal though (google youtube for instructions), and simply makes the gun back to what all other guns are like -- doesn't make it any more dangerous than anything.

the trigger on the sr9c is identical to the glock, very light and short. they may not technically call the sr9c and glocks "single action" but to me in shooting there's little to no difference; i call them single action.

try shooting a taurus PT, those things have a double action that's as long and hard as a revolver; iow, for me i'm too likely to pull my shot WAY off, left and low, just trying to get the damn thing to fire under stress. jmo, i don't want long hard trigger pulls in a grave situation, i just want a thumb safety for safer carry.

kahr - owned a few, lighter trigger pull than most "DA" guns but i still disliked it quite a lot as it's just too slow for me to get the shot on target under stress. (i've spent a lot more practice in stress type scenarios than just shooting to get a bullseye). i no longer own any kahrs but i still think they're good guns, for me there's just other guns that are better.

3" 1911's - i like, however i'm frustrated nearly all 1911's today have this GIGANTIC frigging beavertail, why? the originals never had it; and what's more stupid is having this on a 3" "concealed carry" gun. I sold my kimber ultracarry and got a kimber RCP - over this beavertail issue. I've since now modified my rcp to have a normal thumbspur on the hammer, so my rcp is more like a colt new agent now.

my main carry guns: kimber rcp, ruger sr9c, and a backup of ruger lcp.

Think about:
- how well you can draw the gun from concealment, and shoot it well, all under stress.
- how safe it is to carry with a round in the pipe if you carry with one in the pipe; or do you want to opt to carry without one in the pipe.

me, i need a thumb safety for safeness in carry, i need a single action trigger and snag-free exterior for fast retrieval and accurate shooting.

i think the glock design is perfect for military/combat; i'm not comfy with it for ccw; JMO!
armygreen is offline   Quote Quick Reply
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting new lift.BDS vs Zone MickeYJ YJ Tech Forum 14 08-13-2012 12:30 AM
Flame on! Jeeps a fire BillyPete JK General Discussion Forum 61 05-04-2012 08:38 AM
NHTSA To Launch Jeep Fire Investigation Servo JK General Discussion Forum 3 04-01-2012 11:12 PM
2 dr vs Unlimited? briwor088 JK General Discussion Forum 24 04-01-2012 09:56 PM
Powertrax Lock-Right vs No-slip Traction BLK00TJ TJ General Discussion Forum 8 04-01-2012 09:52 PM



» Featured Product

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 PM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC