Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > General Jeep Discussions > General Jeep Discussion > Jeep Trade for a 1979 Trans Am

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: Jeep Trade for a 1979 Trans Am Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
03-28-2011 07:44 PM
flattopchevy I have traded many times, usually hot rod/ muscle car for 4x4 or visa-versa. I would stay away from this car. The only 79 T/A's holding any value are the 10th anniversary.
Also stay away from the Olds 403/Auto cars. The Pontiac 400 cars all came with 4 speed and WS6 4 wheel disc brakes
03-28-2011 12:35 PM
StreetsideStig
Quote:
Originally Posted by joemd60 View Post
The deal breaker to me is the automatic transmission.
Same here, though I don't know if I'd be able to drive it unless I grew a mullet and got it permed, and bought a white leather suit to match the paint.
03-24-2011 07:43 PM
Mr. Sinister
Quote:
Originally Posted by jebby View Post
real men drive stick.......
and get beat at the track by boys with automatics.
03-24-2011 06:03 PM
99jeeper
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Sinister View Post
For starters, it's twisted up. Look at the fitment between the front of the driver's door and the fender, now look at the gaps on either side of the trunk. The hood looks a little skewed toward the passenger side front and the passenger side door looks like it fits well, so I'd bet it either got smacked on the driver's side front or the subframe has gotten weak from rot. It's obviously been repainted, probably from an accident repair. The body rust in the pictures looks typical for those cars, but not bad. The rust in the rocker seam on the driver's side might be cause for concern.
The engine has been bored .030 over, and on a 400, that's as far as you can go or the cylinder walls become too thin. He doesn't mention what heads are on the motor, so they're probably the garbage '79 smogger heads. Which means the intake and cam aren't doing a thing for it. Anything bigger than a 750 carb on that engine would be completely unnecessary. I'd bet my little 350 will run circles around that thing with a 670 carb, which is the same 670 carb I had on my old 400 that would have run circles around that t/a as well.
It's not to say it's not a good project car, but know what you're getting into before you buy.
x2, i have owned alot of that body style camero/firebird ,and that car is a 2500$ car to the person who wants it real bad.(my opinion!)i'd hang on to the jeep unless you get car plus cash&ya want it real bad!
03-24-2011 06:02 PM
cavediverjc Looks like it belongs right at home in the trailer park.......
03-24-2011 05:52 PM
jebby real men drive stick.......
03-24-2011 08:43 AM
Tuggin
Ta

I had a firebrd, basically the same car. Check carefully behind the rear bumper...the frames go bad in that area and are very difficult if not impossible to fix to factory specs. They are fun to drive and easy to get in trouble with!

Tom
03-23-2011 06:35 PM
joemd60 The deal breaker to me is the automatic transmission.
03-23-2011 06:32 PM
bwdenman Cloth seats and not T-top....pass!
03-23-2011 05:03 PM
shalamara I agree with Sinister. Also You would want to run the vin Number to be sure its a true TA. You can just type in 1979 Trans Am in a search engine and get lots of things on them to include value. But that one is just a project car, and needs lots of work.
03-23-2011 01:38 PM
Mr. Sinister For starters, it's twisted up. Look at the fitment between the front of the driver's door and the fender, now look at the gaps on either side of the trunk. The hood looks a little skewed toward the passenger side front and the passenger side door looks like it fits well, so I'd bet it either got smacked on the driver's side front or the subframe has gotten weak from rot. It's obviously been repainted, probably from an accident repair. The body rust in the pictures looks typical for those cars, but not bad. The rust in the rocker seam on the driver's side might be cause for concern.
The engine has been bored .030 over, and on a 400, that's as far as you can go or the cylinder walls become too thin. He doesn't mention what heads are on the motor, so they're probably the garbage '79 smogger heads. Which means the intake and cam aren't doing a thing for it. Anything bigger than a 750 carb on that engine would be completely unnecessary. I'd bet my little 350 will run circles around that thing with a 670 carb, which is the same 670 carb I had on my old 400 that would have run circles around that t/a as well.
It's not to say it's not a good project car, but know what you're getting into before you buy.
03-23-2011 01:17 PM
silvrevo nice gutless turd there..............get a Jeep.
03-23-2011 12:13 AM
Thebandit1980 notice the jeep in the first pic? seriously though, I couldn't trade my T/A for a jeep, nor could I trade my jeep far a T/A. Gotta keep 'em both I guess
03-22-2011 11:44 PM
jp2611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thebandit1980 View Post
??
Now THAT'S a TA!!!!!!!!!!!! The white one? errr oh not so much-but I am old school.

Seriously though-I can't see trading my Jeep for any TA. Maybe if I could have another Jeep to trade for the good looking TA------nah that prolly won't work either. I think he knows what he's got.
03-22-2011 11:37 PM
Thebandit1980 ??
03-22-2011 11:36 PM
Thebandit1980 I'd stay away from that car. I could see signs of rust in the pics and its usually worse in person, plus the interior had missing glove box lid and other stuff. If you want a trans am... what do you have to trade for it???
03-22-2011 11:19 PM
RatherBNarizona that thing is sick... but so are Jeeps
03-22-2011 10:24 PM
c.m.martin1009 That car is bad@ss.....
03-22-2011 10:18 PM
express705 i wouldn't be caught dead in that car.

my .02
03-22-2011 10:16 PM
Wantstojeep
Jeep Trade for a 1979 Trans Am

Hey guys,

I am new here but not to jeeps, I have a question and I am looking to some feed back on this so if you would give me all the opinions that you have.

I have ran across this add on CL and was wondering if anyone out would even really trade a Jeep for that car. I mean it looks like its in ok to good shape.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks.

1979 Trans AM / Trade for Jeep Wrangler

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC