Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > CJ Jeep Forum > CJ General Discussion Forum > 1979 CJ 5 project

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: 1979 CJ 5 project Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
06-22-2013 06:06 PM
gcaughron Please remember that this is just my opinion. I have owned CJ-5's in the past and am currently looking for another.
A spring over on a CJ-5 is scary to me. Most people spring them over and do not use new springs just the worn out old springs. Horrible idea IMO. The wheelbase is around 84", or 10" shy of your TJ. The good news is that it is reverse shackled. This makes a world of difference in how it handles and articulates. I would not own a CJ-anything that is not reversed as I like to drive them on the road as well. My suggestion is get rid of the spring over and do a 4" kit on it. It will drive much nicer on road than it does now. CJ-5's are capable off-road and quite nimble and in the hands of a good driver can go wherever you want within reason. They are limited due to the wheelbase for rock crawling. You will see most crawlers out there with 114-117" wheelbases. Just a little food for thought.
As for steering, the heavy duty tie rod and drag link on any Jeep is money well spent IMO. You might check jeepforum.com for more specifics for the CJ-5 as there are a bunch of folks who have way more experience and ideas than I. Best of luck to you.
06-22-2013 01:29 AM
The Big-A
Quote:
Originally Posted by gcaughron View Post
The Dana 44 carrier isn't as strong as the model 20 that resides in the rear now. The problem with the model 20 is that the axle tubes are weak but a truss will fix that. The carrier is in the same strength range of a Ford 9-inch. The plus to the 8.8 is that most are disc brake units if you can get the brake balance correct. Most of my friends that are running 40+ inch tires are running corporate 14 bolt rears with Dana 60 fronts. You will find as they did, a Dana 44 will scatter the axle joints with bigger tires especially if you are on the throttle and it bounces and gains traction. My suggestion is keep it under 35's which will mean you can keep your stock axles. The Spicer book recommends 4.10's as the strongest carrier in the model 30 front. Add a 4:1 kit to the 300 transfer case and it will work well with that combination without a lot of expense. Then you can enjoy playing with it until you acquire the bigger and better parts. CJ-5's are fun, I really hope you enjoy it.
We'll, that was for sure informing. I would have never guessed that the model 20 would have a stronger carrier then the Dana 44 or the same as the Ford 9". But I do have a few more question, and would like your point of view on them. The guy I got it from did spring overs on and reversed the shakles on it. Should I undo the spring overs and put a true lift kit on it or just leave it the way it is? Also what would be the best steering system upgrades for it? Should I keep more of a stock steering system or putting something that can handle a lot more ware and tare? Cause on my TJ I have heavy duitty tie rod and drag link and I don't have any troubles with it.
06-21-2013 07:07 PM
gcaughron The Dana 44 carrier isn't as strong as the model 20 that resides in the rear now. The problem with the model 20 is that the axle tubes are weak but a truss will fix that. The carrier is in the same strength range of a Ford 9-inch. The plus to the 8.8 is that most are disc brake units if you can get the brake balance correct. Most of my friends that are running 40+ inch tires are running corporate 14 bolt rears with Dana 60 fronts. You will find as they did, a Dana 44 will scatter the axle joints with bigger tires especially if you are on the throttle and it bounces and gains traction. My suggestion is keep it under 35's which will mean you can keep your stock axles. The Spicer book recommends 4.10's as the strongest carrier in the model 30 front. Add a 4:1 kit to the 300 transfer case and it will work well with that combination without a lot of expense. Then you can enjoy playing with it until you acquire the bigger and better parts. CJ-5's are fun, I really hope you enjoy it.
06-21-2013 01:09 AM
The Big-A
1979 CJ 5 project

Just got a 1979 CJ 5 a few weeks a good, and I'm excited to start turning it in to a bad ass off roadder!



Attachment 264081



Attachment 264082



Attachment 264083



Attachment 264084



Attachment 264085



Attachment 264086



Attachment 264087


I got a few ideas of what I want to do with it.
(T-18 4 speed with 300 transfer case, 4.88 gears, putting coil springs in the front, 40 15.50 R15, nice offset wheels)

But I'm not sure if I should put a Dana 44 under it or the Ford 8.8. I have been told two different things and I'm wanting more input. So if you guys got some ideas feel free to say them, or if you have a better idea about something let me know as we'll.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC