Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > General Discussion Forums > Off-Topic > Photography Suggestions

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: Photography Suggestions Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
01-11-2011 03:27 PM
McBear
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffk42 View Post
I have an OM-4T as well. Sadly, it doesn't get used any more. When I saw that you can hardly get $200 for them lately, I decided to just keep it. What a great camera though. Best film camera I ever had.
That is the problem with progress. I have three OM bodies, seven lenses, bellows and shift for 35 and have only used it three times in the past two years [macro work and the shift once]. Then it is off to the scanner for that extra step.

Once Kodachrome passed this last month the ability to shoot 25ASA/ISO went away and super fine resolution with it.

Now my backpack consists of an Olympus E3, E30, three zooms, two fixed lenses, extra flash, remote and a laptop, all hooked to a Bogen 3040/3047 tripod. It is why I call the LJ my rolling tripod. I need the extra room for all my stuff.
01-11-2011 11:35 AM
virginian
Quote:
Originally Posted by navret View Post
not exactly trying for a straight line are you? when you hit 95, don't forget to stop a cracker barrel for some good eats. lots of traffic around DC.
I'm adding about 900 extra miles so I can visit friends from grad school along the way. Living in NYC, everyone eventually comes to visit you but it's not often that I'm able to hit up friends from Memphis etc.

You don't have to school me on Cracker Barrel--I'm very familiar with the Cherry Pancake Coma especially when I combine it with some kind of breakfast meat.
01-11-2011 07:48 AM
jeffk42
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBear View Post
My decision tree for RAW is that if I am looking for a well shot "scenic photograph" I shoot RAW, but then I also bring out the tripod and the Olympus E30 DSLR. If the spontaneity of the photo is most important, such as family, parties, gatherings I will shoot with a point and click and JPG.

In the old days my Pentax 6X7 was the DSLR of the day, loaded with 64Ektachrome and my OM-1 thru OM4T was the faster, easier point and shoot loaded with 100-200ASA film.

We won't even talk about the Speed Grafix.
I have an OM-4T as well. Sadly, it doesn't get used any more. When I saw that you can hardly get $200 for them lately, I decided to just keep it. What a great camera though. Best film camera I ever had.
01-10-2011 10:13 PM
navret
Quote:
Originally Posted by virginian View Post
Not this round--WA, ID, MT, WY, CO, KS, OK, AR, TN, VA, MD, PA, NJ, and finally the BQE for the final stretch.

I'm pretty sure it's going to be a blast so I plan on doing it again some time this summer and Rushmore would be on that list. The second time might be in the gf's hybrid civic at 48mpg...
not exactly trying for a straight line are you? when you hit 95, don't forget to stop a cracker barrel for some good eats. lots of traffic around DC.
01-10-2011 09:32 PM
virginian
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewryan11 View Post

If you plan on going through S.D. on your travels you should go see Mt. Rushmore. it is fantastically beautiful.
Not this round--WA, ID, MT, WY, CO, KS, OK, AR, TN, VA, MD, PA, NJ, and finally the BQE for the final stretch.

I'm pretty sure it's going to be a blast so I plan on doing it again some time this summer and Rushmore would be on that list. The second time might be in the gf's hybrid civic at 48mpg...
01-10-2011 08:55 PM
navret wow the only things in this thread i understand is mcbears aim and shoot, and i have heard of pentex. does this mean my polaroid "swinger" is dated? sounds like a great trip cross country.
01-10-2011 08:47 PM
virginian Thanks everyone. My natural reaction when I hear things like "light meters" means that I should probably frame a good shot and just accept my jpeg status in photography life.

When I had my D40, the pictures I ended up were incredible, but with the bulky (for what I'm used to) kit lens, I didn't take it with me all that often. Had I invested three hundy in the 50mm lens, I probably would have taken it with me a lot more.

5 days to go...
01-10-2011 08:05 PM
flyin-lowe Not that some great pictures aren't taken with point and shoots ( I am not bashing them at all) but,if you are taking the type of photographs that you are going to be doing some serious editing on then use the DSLR and shoot in RAW. If you are going to be just snapping some snapshots of the trip then shoot JPEG's. I might be wrong but I would bet that a good photographer with a DSLR can shoot JPEGS that will be a better finished product then RAW edited images with a point and shoot. That said it is not always about the equipment. I have seen a cell phone pic on a photo forum that you would swear was taken with a several thousand dollar camera.
01-10-2011 05:05 PM
matthewryan11
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewryan11 View Post
Usually you can use processing software to convert RAW format to JPEG. I was looking at the specs on the panasonic website, it looks like you can shoot in RAW and JPEG so that may be the easier route even though it does take up more memory. That is how I shoot with my camera, you can always delete anything you don't want for Flikr, Etc.

Have fun with both your new toys!
* I meant to say raw and jpeg at the same time
01-10-2011 03:04 PM
McBear My decision tree for RAW is that if I am looking for a well shot "scenic photograph" I shoot RAW, but then I also bring out the tripod and the Olympus E30 DSLR. If the spontaneity of the photo is most important, such as family, parties, gatherings I will shoot with a point and click and JPG.

In the old days my Pentax 6X7 was the DSLR of the day, loaded with 64Ektachrome and my OM-1 thru OM4T was the faster, easier point and shoot loaded with 100-200ASA film.

We won't even talk about the Speed Grafix.
01-10-2011 11:53 AM
jeffk42 Yeah I'll usually shoot RAW for vacation photos and actual photographs taken for the sake of photography, if that makes sense. Like this:



On the other hand, family snapshots, etc. often end up as JPG.

The RAW images for my camera (a Canon 5D Mk II) are about 25MB each, so that adds up quick. I have a wallet filled with over a dozen 8GB and 16GB cards for that reason.
01-10-2011 11:46 AM
Geoff@Bestop
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffk42 View Post
RAW will give you a lot more latitude in post-processing, allowing more manipulation before clipping occurs. If you're a person that maybe just makes minor corrections (if any) before uploading them somewhere, then JPG is the easier choice.

On the other hand, if you carefully hand-tweak every photo to get the best possible image out of it, then RAW is the best option. Raw is easily converted to JPG for uploading to flickr, etc.
X2!

The only reason to bother with the hassle of the RAW file size is if you plan to do INTENSE digital darkroom stuff - really get into adjusting color levels, etc.

You can still modify JPG's a lot, just not quite as much.

If you shoot RAW you will fill up your camera, and that frequently means you will get all worried about the number of shots you're taking. And for me, that removes one of the cool things about digital over film: just shooting anything I see without getting all stressed about my tripod, light meters, etc.

Have fun on your trip!!
01-10-2011 07:39 AM
jeffk42 RAW will give you a lot more latitude in post-processing, allowing more manipulation before clipping occurs. If you're a person that maybe just makes minor corrections (if any) before uploading them somewhere, then JPG is the easier choice.

On the other hand, if you carefully hand-tweak every photo to get the best possible image out of it, then RAW is the best option. Raw is easily converted to JPG for uploading to flickr, etc.
01-10-2011 07:30 AM
baja It is a must for our family to take the young-uns to see Mt Rushmore.Last time out we spent the coin and took a helicopter tour.It was truly awesome.If I could afford to,we move out to Rapid City.
01-10-2011 03:22 AM
matthewryan11 Oh, and I definitely know what you mean about using the premium compact camera more than a DSLR. I have a DSLR and a Canon powershot G10 and I tend to use the powershot more often mostly due to its size. It usually hangs out either locked in my glovebox in the jeep(A tuffy glovebox) or is in the big inside pocket of my vest when I'm on the motorcycle.

If you plan on going through S.D. on your travels you should go see Mt. Rushmore. it is fantastically beautiful.
01-10-2011 03:03 AM
matthewryan11 Usually you can use processing software to convert RAW format to JPEG. I was looking at the specs on the panasonic website, it looks like you can shoot in RAW and JPEG so that may be the easier route even though it does take up more memory. That is how I shoot with my camera, you can always delete anything you don't want for Flikr, Etc.

Have fun with both your new toys!
01-10-2011 01:21 AM
virginian
Photography Suggestions

Moving closer to my roadtrip to bring the TJ to Brooklyn from Seattle--less than a week and counting. I picked up a Panasonic Lumix LX5 to capture the journey as it's not as bulky as a DSLR and therefore, will probably be used more. However, it's much better all around than my trusty old SD790.

I can choose to shoot in RAW or JPEG mode for the trip.

My question to the seasoned photogs out there is: should I shoot in all RAW so that I have a better final product or just sit with JPEG? I'm not SURE that I'll master my GIMP software, but I feel like RAW will give me more options once I get back. Also, if I shoot in RAW, am I limited if I, at first, just want to upload pics to Flickr or imageshack etc; that is, can I convert RAW back to JPEG?

Pretty psyched about my new toy. Also psyched about the new camera.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC