|03-14-2008 10:49 PM|
|4point||I'd say for most part home school works pretty well, even without credentialed instruction. But then again I've have a good friend thats doing this, he and his wife never graduated high school. AND.................she is as dumb as a post.|
|03-14-2008 09:05 PM|
My brother and sister-in-law are home schooling their 2 kids. My nephew, 17, is graduating this year, with 1 1/2 years of collage already under his belt. My niece, 15, will be starting the same collage program my nephew took, next year. They are both far ahead of other kids their ages and they are 2 of the most well adjusted kids I have ever met. They also have their own band, with 2 other kids from their home school association, and are making good money, and having the time of their young lives, traveling around Washington preforming.
That said, not everyone is cut out for home schooling. I don't know what it's like in other states but, in Washington, to home school your kids, you have to take classes to become credited. It's not the same as a teacher would do but it's not just a high school diploma either. The kids also have to be tested, by the school district, a couple times a year, to be sure they are actually learning what they're supposed to be learning.
|03-14-2008 08:10 PM|
I have only had maybe 4 teachers out of the 12 years of public school who liked their job and was worth a flip.
|03-14-2008 07:56 PM|
|Smeghead||I agree, id probably fail 6th grade right now. Having said that a home schooled child has won the national spelling bee twice in a row now.|
|03-14-2008 06:56 PM|
No Child Gets Ahead
Parents of the approximately 200,000 home-schooled children in California are reeling from the possibility that they may have to shutter their classrooms and go back to school themselves if they want to continue teaching their own kids. On Feb. 28, Judge H. Walter Croskey of the Second District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles ruled that children ages six to 18 may be taught only by credentialed teachers in public or private schools or at home by Mom and Dad, but only if they have a teaching degree. Citing state law that goes back to the early 1950s, Croskey declared that "California courts have held that under provisions in the Education Code, parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children." Furthermore, the judge wrote, if instructors teach without credentials they will be subject to criminal action.
This news raised a furor among home schooling advocates, including government officials. "Every California child deserves a quality education and parents should have the right to decide what's best for their children," Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said in a statement today. "Parents should not be penalized for acting in the best interests of their children's education. This outrageous ruling must be overturned by the courts and if the courts don't protect parents' rights then, as elected officials, we will." "It's kind of scary," says Julie Beth Lamb, an Oakdale, California, parent who, with no teaching credentials, has taught her four children for 15 years. "If that ruling is held up, this would make us one of the most restrictive states in the nation."
The debacle originated with a suit over child abuse. One of the eight children of Philip and Mary Long, a Los Angeles couple, had filed a complaint of abuse and neglect with the L.A. Department of Children and Family Services. The agency determined that the Long children were being home schooled, taught by their uncredentialed mother while officially enrolled in independent study at Sunland Christian School. The DCFS then turned to the courts to mandate that the children attend public school so that teachers might spot evidence of abuse (a charge the parents deny). A juvenile court, however, determined that the Longs had a constitutional right to home school their children. The DCFS appealed and the case landed in Croskey's appellate court.
For years, the state of California has allowed parents to home school as long as they file papers to create a private school and hire a tutor with credentials or if their child participates in an independent study program through a credentialed school. In evaluating the Long case, however, Judge Croskey found that state law forbade any home schooling that was not taught by a credentialed teacher and that what California had been allowing was, in his judicial opinion, illegal. In 1953, another appellate court ruled against home-schooling parents who didn't want to adhere to California's compulsory education laws, which require kids between six and 18 to attend a credentialed school. The current case is most likely to be appealed to California's Supreme Court.
"We weren't trying to change the law on home schooling," says Leslie Heimov of the Children's Law Center, which represents the Long children involved in the case. "The law is accurate it hasn't changed since the 1950s." She says the Center does not even have an opinion on home schooling. They just wanted to do what was best for the children represented in the case.
The fact that this sweeping ruling has sprung from such an individualized case is what has most outraged home schooling advocates. "Public schools are not a solution to the problem of child abuse," says Leslie Buchanan, president of the HomeSchool Association of California. Jack O'Connell, California State Superintendent of Public Instruction the equivalent of a department of education now faces the potential crisis of dealing with tens of thousands of truants. Does he know what will happen next? "I honestly don't know," O'Connell says, adding that his department is reviewing the case. "There is some angst in the field."