Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ General Discussion Forum > Currie Antirock, tell me my idea is dumb...

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: Currie Antirock, tell me my idea is dumb... Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
02-29-2012 04:59 PM
GoldenSahara00
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ageless Stranger
So I guess the op got his question answered?
Yep and Looks like the anti rock is about 2 inches narrower per side compared to the stocks widest point.
02-29-2012 01:21 PM
netlohcs "answered" for the time being. We had a MASSSSIVVVE snowstorm hit us today and I really wanted to be don with my jeep project before the storm hit, so for the time being I replaced my factory links (one broken, one almost dead).

I will probably look into the antirock in the near future, but I think i'd like to try driving a TJ with one installed first before I spring for one. Thank you to everyone for their input.
02-29-2012 09:29 AM
Ageless Stranger So I guess the op got his question answered?
02-27-2012 09:12 AM
GoldenSahara00 Stock is 3 1/2-1/4 ish at widest.
02-27-2012 04:10 AM
Ageless Stranger
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ageless Stranger View Post
I'd be happy to do that for you. Be back with that info asap.
1 3/8" from the frame rail to the outside of the arm. Both sides.
02-27-2012 01:12 AM
Ageless Stranger
Quote:
Originally Posted by netlohcs View Post
If nothing else, could someone that actually has an antirock give me a precise measurement as to how far it sticks out from the frame? If you could measure both sides just to make sure they are equal it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I'd be happy to do that for you. Be back with that info asap.
02-27-2012 12:08 AM
netlohcs If nothing else, could someone that actually has an antirock give me a precise measurement as to how far it sticks out from the frame? If you could measure both sides just to make sure they are equal it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
02-26-2012 03:45 PM
UnlimitedLJ04
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ageless Stranger View Post
To the original poster: Your idea is dumb.

That's harsh, but it's what you asked for. I've been running an Antirock for several months and love it. But I often drove my TJ with the stock anti sway bar disconnected entirely. So the minimal amount of extra body roll with the Antirock doesn't bother me at all. When you start modifying a vehicle in ways that were not concerns in it's original design you have to be willing to make compromises.

Put washers behind your steering stops, or put smaller tires on your Jeep, or let it rub your stock sway bar, or run the Antirock and be happy with slightly more body roll on the street, and never having to disconnect again. Or do whatever you want to do and live with the results.

YMMV.
x2 on what he said.
02-26-2012 03:42 PM
necromancer_tat
Quote:
Originally Posted by netlohcs View Post
Hey everybody,

As per my other post(s), I am running 34.4" tires and they are currently contacting my swaybar at full lock. I would like to resolve this issue so that I can keep my nice tight turning radius. Thus I need a swaybar that really hugs the frame.

I have looked at the Currie unit and it would be perfect for me except the fact that it is going to give me much less anti-roll than the factory unit. I would really like to stay near factory performance if at all possible.

So my question is this:

Normally the currie bar is mounted through the tube at the very front of the frame. What if I were to find a mounting location somewhat closer to the axle and then drill my own holes on the swaybar arms so that they are close to 1/2 as long as they are now. This would significantly reduce the amount of flex that the antirock affords.

I don't really see any reason as to why this wouldnt work, unless the torsion rod is not capable of handling the additional stress I would be putting on it. Anyone have any comments? I would really like to do this, I think it would turn out pretty well

P.S. - if at all possible, i'd really rather not have comments to the effect of "just run it like they intend, you'll be fine". They put a warning right in the product description that on-road performance WILL NOT be as good as the factory sway bar. I can't imagine that they would add that in there unless there was a significant decrease in on-road performance.

Any input?? Thanks a bunch guys!
Supposedly running the rear antirock compliments the front antirock and brings back the stability lost from running only a front antirock. The rear antirock is actually stiffer than the factory setting.
02-26-2012 03:37 PM
netlohcs From a spacing issue, I know the antirock would give me enough clearance. As it is right now its close even with the stock bar. I wasnt really forseeing this turn into a tire offset debate, I was more hoping for a discussion about the antirock, its flex rate compared to stock, and other ways to mount it. Like I said i'll probably post more later but for now i'm workin on hackin up my fenders
02-26-2012 02:53 PM
GoldenSahara00
Quote:
Originally Posted by netlohcs

Thanks, that would be helpful. It seems as though people around here are fairly quick to attack the person, not the problem. I'd post more on it (maybe I will later) but for now i'm going to work on the jeep.
They all mean well. There are a lot of people on here who are stubborn and some members treat everyone that way. Personally I don't think the antirock will work if it was modified the way you said. I bet it does hug the frame better. And I have also heard that its rate is very close to stock so. I'd look into the widths and if that doesn't help you I would look into just slightly less backpacking.
02-26-2012 02:47 PM
netlohcs
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenSahara00 View Post
I think the guys just doesn't want to rub his sway bar since he is at stock height. Can anyone measure tue distance from the frame to the furthest out point on tw anti rock so he can compare to his sway bar now.

Otherwise I would say new wheels is the best answer here.
Thanks, that would be helpful. It seems as though people around here are fairly quick to attack the person, not the problem. I'd post more on it (maybe I will later) but for now i'm going to work on the jeep.
02-26-2012 02:21 PM
GoldenSahara00
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.B.
I think this may be the link...

http://www.wranglerforum.com/f5/anti...son-93309.html

As a fellow engineer, great write-up! Pay particular attention to the assumptions made. Usually up travel and down travel are not equal........
Awesome write up and makes sense.
02-26-2012 02:12 PM
B.B. I think this may be the link...

http://www.wranglerforum.com/f5/anti...son-93309.html

As a fellow engineer, great write-up! Pay particular attention to the assumptions made, especially equilibrium. Usually up travel and down travel are not equal........

After further evaluation, I'm not sure The magnitude of the rotational displacement in the torsion bar itself is taken into account. Based on the displacement (rotational), his assessment is absolutely correct. That is the rate of anti-rotation changes exponentially once either side hits a bumpstop, but I would expect that is what Currie would design it to do. Life is good....
02-26-2012 01:53 PM
GoldenSahara00 I think the guys just doesn't want to rub his sway bar since he is at stock height. Can anyone measure tue distance from the frame to the furthest out point on tw anti rock so he can compare to his sway bar now.

Otherwise I would say new wheels is the best answer here.
02-26-2012 01:34 PM
netlohcs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford View Post
I remember that thread and it was interesting but I neglected to bookmark it.
Anybody have a link to this? Id be very interested in this data. Id search right now but I'm on phone and its painfully slow.
02-26-2012 11:15 AM
DevilDogDoc Well this forum needs your help as you can tell.
02-26-2012 10:59 AM
Benderff
Quote:
Originally Posted by netlohcs View Post
I think you kind of missed my point. My backspacing is correct, the rims I have are made specifically for the TJ. My discussion was not about moving my tires at all... I am trying to figure out how to get a near-stock swaybar stiffness out of the currie unit.
If your tires are rubbing at full turn, your backspacing is not correct for the width of tire you are running. If you ever air down your tires for off road use they will rub even worse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilDogDoc View Post
Benderff, good to see you here!!
Thanks! I really didn't need another forum to waste time on . I need to send you a PM about some runs coming up this summer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nick50471 View Post
I want help to fix a simple problem but I don't want to use anyone's advice.
You speak the truth.
02-26-2012 10:46 AM
nick50471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ageless Stranger View Post
To the original poster: Your idea is dumb.
02-26-2012 10:40 AM
DevilDogDoc Benderff, good to see you here!!
02-26-2012 10:33 AM
Tdog02 Ran trails yesterday with two jeeps that had a currie antirock installed. I picked their brains cause I like the idea of not having to disconnect. One was a trail buggy the other a daily driver. From what I learned, the difference from the stock swaybar is barely noticeable. Btw, if currie made it the way they did there must be a reason, modify at your own risk!
02-26-2012 10:19 AM
Ageless Stranger To the original poster: Your idea is dumb.

That's harsh, but it's what you asked for. I've been running an Antirock for several months and love it. But I often drove my TJ with the stock anti sway bar disconnected entirely. So the minimal amount of extra body roll with the Antirock doesn't bother me at all. When you start modifying a vehicle in ways that were not concerns in it's original design you have to be willing to make compromises.

Put washers behind your steering stops, or put smaller tires on your Jeep, or let it rub your stock sway bar, or run the Antirock and be happy with slightly more body roll on the street, and never having to disconnect again. Or do whatever you want to do and live with the results.

YMMV.
02-26-2012 10:14 AM
Ageless Stranger
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick50471 View Post
I want help to fix a simple problem but I don't want to use anyone's advice.
02-26-2012 10:10 AM
Jerry Bransford
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick50471 View Post
I remember a thread a while back were an engineering students did some interesting calculations on the Antirock. You don't by chance have it linked?
I remember that thread and it was interesting but I neglected to bookmark it.
02-26-2012 10:07 AM
nick50471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford
You're overly worried about that. With the right shocks, you can set the Currie to its loosest setting as mine is set at and still have a tight handling TJ. Only with sloppy soft shocks will you have extra roll that you may not be happy with.

Even though I am constantly driving tight twisty roads through our local mountains, my TJ handles like it is on rails... OME Nitrocharger shocks and the Currie set on its loosest setting.
I just received my Antirock and Currectlync from Savvy.

I remember a thread a while back were an engineering students did some interesting calculations on the Antirock. You don't by chance have it linked?
02-26-2012 10:04 AM
nick50471 I want help to fix a simple problem but I don't want to use anyone's advice.
02-26-2012 10:01 AM
Jerry Bransford
Quote:
Originally Posted by netlohcs View Post
I have looked at the Currie unit and it would be perfect for me except the fact that it is going to give me much less anti-roll than the factory unit.
You're overly worried about that. With the right shocks, you can set the Currie to its loosest setting as mine is set at and still have a tight handling TJ. Only with sloppy soft shocks will you have extra roll that you may not be happy with.

Even though I am constantly driving tight twisty roads through our local mountains, my TJ handles like it is on rails... OME Nitrocharger shocks and the Currie set on its loosest setting.
02-26-2012 09:55 AM
jgorm He already has wheels with 3.6" of BS, just a low lift (no lift). This is another option but I'm not sure if the clearance is any better.

Welcome to Off Road Only!
Quote:
SwayLOC SR™ is a single rate version of our proven SwayLOC product. With the 1.25” solid torsion bar, the on road rate is firmer than the stock anti-swaybar, and when you disconnect, the passenger side arm freewheels with no resistance, delivering the full flex of being fully disconnected.
02-26-2012 07:51 AM
Mudweiser Yeah, i had the Currie on my black Jeep...it is adjustable from near stock performance to almost disconnected performance. 3 or 4 holes if i remember correctly. I would avoid trying to modify its original design or placement. Thats just me though.
02-26-2012 05:26 AM
JDJeeper I used the currie antirock on a TJ with a 4in lift. I placed the swaybar link in the most foward hole on the arm, the ride wasnt much different than stock.
This thread has more than 30 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 PM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC