Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > General Tech Forums > General Jeep Discussion > Inline 6 vs. V6

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: Inline 6 vs. V6 Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
05-11-2013 07:18 PM
n00g7
Quote:
Originally Posted by xzy View Post
I just saw a 2005 soft top for sale with 64,000 for 12,500. I know the seller. It was never off pavement....but compared to my 2013 JKUS it's tiny and claustrophobic. Sure there's more sheet metal, but when I shut the doors the whole side of the jeep flexed. The I6 might prove to be better, but I'll take mine with the 3.6 any day.

Like a good golf club, it's supposed to flex. How about them door handles on the JK?

05-11-2013 04:33 PM
xzy I just saw a 2005 soft top for sale with 64,000 for 12,500. I know the seller. It was never off pavement....but compared to my 2013 JKUS it's tiny and claustrophobic. Sure there's more sheet metal, but when I shut the doors the whole side of the jeep flexed. The I6 might prove to be better, but I'll take mine with the 3.6 any day.
05-08-2013 11:26 PM
Darth Daddie I search for 8 months to find my Jeep. 2005 50k on a I-6. Previously owned by an old guy that pull it behind an RV. I really wanted that I-6, 6 speed manual trans. And WOW it has a lot of power, high and low end. Minivans suck. Really, they do.
05-08-2013 10:04 PM
jkmohican If the 3.6 proves itself in the long run in reliability, it's a no brainer. The I6 will only have so much of an advantage, and it isn't much more reliable than the 3.8, which is extremely reliable. If the 3.6 can hold its own for as long as the 3.8, than the I6 has very little use. A properly geared 3.6 will have the torque and and still the RPMs to get better mileage and more useable power on the highway at speeds the I6 couldn't imagine.
05-08-2013 08:28 PM
Beaver5 I liked the 258 and i love the 4.0. Not crazy about the V6. The 4.0 is best of both worlds, reliable torquey. I6 with EFI whats not to love? easy to work on? i wouldnt know.
05-08-2013 05:13 PM
Trek7.2FX The jury is still out on the 3.6 from a longevity standpoint. It sure is fun to drive, though!
05-08-2013 03:59 PM
n00g7
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenSahara00 View Post
What about 3.6 vs. 4.0
vs 4.6
05-08-2013 03:39 PM
GoldenSahara00
Quote:
Originally Posted by n00g7 View Post
This thread may be 5 years old, but the I6 is still better.
What about 3.6 vs. 4.0
05-08-2013 02:36 PM
n00g7 This thread may be 5 years old, but the I6 is still better.
05-08-2013 02:26 PM
TJDave Plenty of time for Jeep to have already replaced the 3.8 minivan motor.
05-08-2013 01:39 PM
jkmohican
Quote:
Originally Posted by whetstone View Post

That's like 65 years in interwebz time!
More like 85. Close though.
05-08-2013 09:56 AM
whetstone
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenSahara00 View Post
Mother of all things ancient and old on WF... This thread is 5 years old!
That's like 65 years in interwebz time!
05-08-2013 09:50 AM
GoldenSahara00 Mother of all things ancient and old on WF... This thread is 5 years old!
05-08-2013 09:31 AM
Morris4x4Center
Quote:
Originally Posted by hedonist View Post
Hello all,

My friend just bought an '08 Wrangler. Correct me if I'm wrong: He has a V6 while my 2000 TJ is an inline 6.

What's the difference? Performance? Longetivity? Efficiency? Is there really that much of a difference?
Your 4.0L will go to 200K miles.... His 3.8L i don't know...
05-08-2013 09:15 AM
Catnip 0_o
Quote:
Originally Posted by hedonist View Post

Literally ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Okay, let me get this point across and I very humbly make this point for I am at the bottom of the totem pole when it comes to Jeep history, knowledge and evolution.

IMO, I think the new Jeeps (speaking from driving my friend's '09 Jeep) have become a bit homogenized and mainstream. The older Jeeps were raw, powerful, and really only fit a certain genre of people. Case in point: The 1st generation Dodge Vipers were loud, had no A/C, very powerful, and had raw and bold lines. The new Vipers, however, are more subtle and less vicious.

My dad has a YJ which I like but the slight nuanced front lights, exemplified Jeeps shift into evolution for the masses. They did, however, shift back to the days of yore by changing back to the older lights after the YJ. People didn't want soft lines or new things, they wanted their old Jeep back which is so ingrained and part of our off road automotive fabric and history.

Look at what Ford has done with the new Mustangs. Look at what Chevy has done with the new Camaros. Look at what Mopar has done with the Challengers and Chargers. No, they are nothing like their classic predecessors but they are not evolving to new space age bizarro designes. They are reverting to the golden times. They are re adapting the old lines that made muscle cars.

I saw a guy in an '09 Rubicon and he had 22 inch wheels chromed to the 9s, he had what it sounded like a $4k sound system. He had funky Xenon type lights he added. He also had his windows up with his A/c blasting. That's not a Jeep but a mini Hummer.

Jeeps aren't Hummers. I frown upon people that own Hummers because I ask the question: "Why?" Why????? Why????? Is bigger really better?

O well. Sorry for the rant but my Jeep has no A/c, no doors(95% of the time), and is just a TJ pretending to be a CJ 'back in the day.'
Love this, Amen
05-08-2013 06:52 AM
whetstone
Quote:
Originally Posted by BILLG View Post
The 3.8 is still a mini van motor first and a Jeep motor second.The 4.0 is a Jeep motor first.I will take a 4.0 over a 3.8 anytime.
05-08-2013 06:45 AM
C.L. Epic Gravedig...
05-08-2013 06:25 AM
Country Outlaw My jeep I currently have has a 2.5L 4 Cylinder engine. I want a little more power and was looking at putting an inline 6 in it. Would the engine mounts line up or would i have to do some modifications?
08-05-2008 02:07 PM
4.0l sahara the tj and jk are totally different.
08-05-2008 12:47 PM
emgee00 What do they do with all the extra space that a V6 model would have. I imagine the engine is significantly shorter??? Did they redesign the engine compartment?
08-05-2008 12:43 PM
4.0l sahara Let me try to sum it up for you. The 4.0 I6 is a proven powerplant that is a pushrod style engien. It reaches peak tourque at a very low rpm making it great for offroading. It is all cast iron. The 3.8l v6 is a cast iron block with aluminum heads. It is a SOHC engien and has a little more hourse power and tourque than the I6 but reaches that at a higher rpm. They both are pretty reliable. IMO the I6 is better. What i've heard from people that have had both is you get same out of the I6 at a much lower rpm. There is nothing wrong with one or the other ,I would rather have a I6.
08-05-2008 11:58 AM
emgee00 I was curious about this info too. I still am uncertain what is best??? I tend to think the V6 is better thatn the old I6 technology. This is just something I cannot seem to get over. Good post!
07-30-2008 09:09 PM
jpdocdave ^thanks for all that

rich also brings up a great point, putting an aluminum head on a cast block does lead to problems. the two metals heat up at different rates.
07-30-2008 09:05 PM
4.0l sahara I6 all the way.
07-30-2008 08:47 PM
richp My main complaint or dislike of the V6 vs the I6 and I4 is that they use iron blocks and alloy heads on the V's. You can overheat an I4 or I6 generally with no big issues, try that on a iron/aluminum engine and at a minimum you will be replacing head gaskets. They expand and contract at different rates vs the iron/iron of the Inline engines which tend to lessen the problem quite a lot.
I have never liked aluminum in any engine.
07-30-2008 07:11 PM
jpdocdave i love this conversation, pastorsteve, that won't be your last post on this topic, cuz its too hard to stop.

this is my favorite argument. the rubicon is the best stock wrangler built as far as capability, who can argue. but i can't stand seeing them in the mall where the owner is too scared to get mud on his tie.

oh yeah, i almost forgot, 4x4 is an option?????? and a car interior, thats what i don't like.
07-30-2008 11:50 AM
hedonist
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdocdave View Post
i cannot argue that the improvements to axles, disconnects and lockers are fantastic. who can argue against that, they should've done that a lot sooner. but there's a lot of pavement pounder rubicons rollin around. the interior was like a freeking 300m or some new car. and the motor just needs more power.

they're nice, my wife wants a 4 dr. they've made improvements that are gonna help them sell to a new group, but its not or me.

the cadillac arguement isn't valid to me, cadillac has always strived for one direction, top of the line, luxury. jeep went from rugged off road, to a direction i'm not gonna describe to not offend anyone.
^
Nicely said!!! +10
07-30-2008 10:00 AM
tiny terror Oh cripes will you people give it up.
07-30-2008 09:56 AM
PastorSteve Again wrong sorry. These are the most off-road capable stock Jeeps ever made. You could never put 32"'s on most previous factory stock Jeeps. With all respect, it's not whether you like the direction Jeep is going in - it's whether they are as or more off-road capable than prior Jeeps and the answer is a resounding yes. If they have better suspensions, better clearance, better .... they're better. My last post on this as it's pointless.
07-30-2008 07:19 AM
jpdocdave
Quote:
Originally Posted by PastorSteve View Post
You're right. It feels like the best wranglers - improved. The whole idea of advancement is to improve on the past. A 2008 Cadillac doesn't feel like a 1968 Cadillac - but it's better. These have the best brakes, ride, amenities, handling, power, fuel economy, suspension, sound systems, electronics (including factory lockers and front sway disconnect).... ever.

You may not like it but it's true.
i cannot argue that the improvements to axles, disconnects and lockers are fantastic. who can argue against that, they should've done that a lot sooner. but there's a lot of pavement pounder rubicons rollin around. the interior was like a freeking 300m or some new car. and the motor just needs more power.

they're nice, my wife wants a 4 dr. they've made improvements that are gonna help them sell to a new group, but its not or me.

the cadillac arguement isn't valid to me, cadillac has always strived for one direction, top of the line, luxury. jeep went from rugged off road, to a direction i'm not gonna describe to not offend anyone.
This thread has more than 30 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC