Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ General Discussion Forum > Calling all gear heads!! Lockers!!

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: Calling all gear heads!! Lockers!! Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
10-04-2008 12:48 PM
4Jeepn Hm. I Like ARB's, ran front and rear, no issues, most important part is the install. As stated stay with standard air line. 4.56's would be fine with 33's. As for the dana 44 with bigger shafts vs a 60, even if shaft size is the same the 60 give's you bigger RP, tubes, housing etc. Its made to handle the shaft size and work as a unit.
10-04-2008 12:47 AM
nicolas-eric The Ected sucks. It locks only 100% in the first few days. Then the clutches begin to wear out.


When you install lockers with new carriers itīs time to think about upgrading to 30 spline axle shafts in the front and/or 33 splines in the rear.
10-03-2008 02:45 PM
Jerry Bransford Isn't the Ected friction clutch-based? If so, I wouldn't want my locker dependent on friction clutches. I got a PM from a a guy last year that told me his slipped when the going got real tough.
10-03-2008 02:42 PM
rketr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timberman View Post
Yup, she certainly is a 44..

Thanks for the info Jerry.. I was also told that I could upgrade the axles in the Dana 44 and add a RD109 ARB (i think) which would make it not only basically "Bullet proof," but the equivalent to a Dana 60.. Any Truth to that?
D44 w/ ARB equiv to D60? Not really.

Bulletproof? No.

Most of all the depends on how you wheel it. I've seen guys w/ c-clip D35's run 35" tires all day long with zero problem. I've seen guys with D44's run 33's and snap 'em.

Dunno, I'm still not convinced that there is such a thing as a "bulletproof" axle, no matter what you stick under there. ('cept for maybe a 2.5 ton rockwell)

ARB vs. Ected? Only know one guy that runs an Ected...and his first offroad trip with it will, by chance, be this weekend. ARB? Know several that run 'em (myself included). All love 'em. Over the years, I've only had 2 problems ever with mine. One time the rear axle was jammed far enough up that it snapped the air line -- 20 mins later was running again. The other time I had the front not want to engage -- enabled and disabled a couple times and it was fine. Zero other problems.
10-02-2008 09:01 PM
Tinker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford View Post
You missed reading the OP's signature that clearly states he has a Dana 44.
Yep, I'll be damned I sure did. .......Nevermind. lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timberman View Post
Yup, she certainly is a 44..

Thanks for the info Jerry.. I was also told that I could upgrade the axles in the Dana 44 and add a RD109 ARB (i think) which would make it not only basically "Bullet proof," but the equivalent to a Dana 60.. Any Truth to that?
Good deal.
10-02-2008 08:26 PM
Jerry Bransford Well the 35 spline axleshafts certainly would be but not the R&P gears and axle housing itself. Still, that kind of an upgrade would make it a tough axle that would be hard to bust.
10-02-2008 07:58 PM
Timberman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford View Post
You missed reading the OP's signature that clearly states he has a Dana 44.
Yup, she certainly is a 44..

Thanks for the info Jerry.. I was also told that I could upgrade the axles in the Dana 44 and add a RD109 ARB (i think) which would make it not only basically "Bullet proof," but the equivalent to a Dana 60.. Any Truth to that?
10-02-2008 07:39 PM
Jerry Bransford
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinker View Post
I'm surprised no one has asked if it is a D35 and told the regular horror stories of locking one.

You missed reading the OP's signature that clearly states he has a Dana 44.
10-02-2008 07:19 PM
Tinker I'm surprised no one has asked if it is a D35 and told the regular horror stories of locking one.

10-02-2008 07:03 PM
Jerry Bransford 4.56 would indeed be the right all-around ratio for 33" tires and it'd make a huge improvement in both on and offroad driving... well worth the extra $$$ to regear. For 33" tires and 4.56 gears, a 39 tooth will give you a dead nuts-on speedometer. For 33" tires and your present 3.73 gearing, a 31 tooth speedo gear will do the trick.
10-02-2008 06:46 PM
Timberman Jerry,

I do have the 5 speed and no, i do not ever plan on going to 35" tires. 33 X 12.5 will be fine for what it do.. It would be one thing if I wheeled all the time, but she is just a pleasure vehicle that I want to be able to tackle rocks and hills... or Hills with Rocks.. Whatever!

I really do not notice a lack of power with her. I think the speedo is off quite a bit because when I travel down I-5 at what i think is 60mph, I am flying by people. If I can get more power and mileage out of the 4:56 it just seems logical that i do so. Doesn't it? I will have the gears apart with the ARB, so for an extra $300-$400, why not do it while we are down there. right?

Thanks sir!
10-02-2008 01:32 PM
Jerry Bransford Do you have an automatic or a 5-speed? That will make a huge difference on what ratio would work best with your 33" tires. Do you think you might ever go to 35" tires?

And to get the higher/lower ratio terms straight, a higher ratio is actually one that has a lower numerical value. So a 3.73 ratio is actually a higher ratio than 4.56 is. So if you refer to 4.56 as being a lower ratio than what you have now, there will be a lot less confusion. A lower ratio like 4.56 (when compared to say 3.73) can actually improve power at both the low end and high end. If you have too low of a ratio, like 3.07, with big tires, it can struggle both offroad and on the highway at 65-70 mph so regearing to a lower ratio will usually improve both.

And on ARB not recommending a heavier-duty air line than the standard air line already is, you can see it at at ARB FAQ's Click Here where it says:

"Q) Does ARB offer a stainless air line to go with the ARB Air Locking Differential?
ARB does offer a heavy duty Aeroquip reinforced rubber hose kit for the Air Locker, part number HDAL.

Note, this kit is available due to popular request, however ARB believes that a correctly installed Air Locker with the standard nylon tube correctly routed along the path of the brake lines of the vehicle is the best for most applications.

Why? Well a reinforced rubber or stainless line can still be snagged, but will do a lot more damage to related components and it is much harder to repair this damage in the field.

A nylon line repair kit is available part number ASK001 and it contains spare line a connector and spare hardware to make speedy and simple field repairs."
10-02-2008 12:33 PM
Jerry Bransford I'll come back to this thread and post more later but don't upgrade the air lines to kevlar or any other heavier-duty version of ARB's air lines. Not even ARB recommends doing so and they say so in their FAQ section on their website. Install only the standard air lines.

That sounds odd I know but here's why... let's say that an air line was mis-routed during installation so it could get snagged offroad. If a kevlar air line was installed, it's strong enough to resist breaking but it's also strong enough to rip out or destroy a fitting instead if it got snagged. ARB's standard air line is plenty strong but it was designed to snap cleanly if it get snagged which can be easily repaired in about 10 seconds with ARB's quick splice air line repair kit. Repairing a fitting, however, on the trail would be very tough if you had used a break-resistant air line.

But... if the ARB Air Locker is properly installed and the air lines are properly routed so they are up and out of the way so they can't get snagged, all of this is a non-issue. Afterall, we don't snag our fuel lines, brake lines, or electrical wiring on the trail because they are all simply properly routed and placed so they are out of the way.
10-02-2008 12:02 PM
Timberman
Calling all gear heads!! Lockers!!

Greetings All!

Well.. I am fishing for some real solid opinions here as some of our fine 4X4 retailers have me completely confused...

Here is what I do know:

I am going to upgrade my gearing from the 3:73 to 4:56 ratio. I wasn't going to do that until all three of these purveyors of fine overpriced 4X4 parts echoed the exact same thing.. Gosh, i didn't have any qualms with her power until they all exclaimed about the benefits of the 4:56 gear ratio.. Will it really be more road/trail friendly, have more power, and get more MPG with that ratio? I am not a mechanic (like I say in every post), but I do understand math quite well.. I always thought that the higher the ratio, the more low-end and less top-end..

So here is where I am confused:

I was pricing the ARB RD116 (w/4:56), RD100 (w/ 4:56), and a CKMA12 air compressor.. I also will upgrade the diff lines to kevlar.

The first company swore by the Auburn Ected Lockers.. They did say that the ARB Lockers are great, but overpriced and overrated. The other said that the Auburn Ecteds were the lousiest lockers on the market. He also added that every one he installed on a Jeep had to be removed because they would permanently lock up.. Now, he did say that he hasn't carried that brand in a couple of years, so Auburn could have made drastic changes, but he was still adamant about staying away from them and going with ARB.

Now, the Gentlemen who were providing me info on the Auburn Ected stated that those lockers have far less parts than ARB thus reducing the potential of trail break-down.. They also said that if an ARB locker breaks a line; i am stuck on the trail..

Would you guys please make some sense out of this?

I am always very appreciative of your advise all!! I really hate spending money twice.. We are talking of a price difference of like $400 between the two..

Timberman!

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.



JeepŪ, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC