Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > JK Jeep Wrangler Forum > JK General Discussion Forum > Most and least "died in" vehicles

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: Most and least "died in" vehicles Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
01-28-2013 02:25 PM
ScottV63
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.L. View Post
Missing from the list is the Pontiac Aztec. NOBODY would be caught dead in one of those...

Where's the LIKE button!
01-27-2013 10:23 PM
Doctorsti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tweak View Post
I went from an 03 350Z, to a 13 JK, guess what happened to my insurance.

BTW I bought the Z when I was 19 and stupid. didnt do my research and I had no idea that after paying the $320 a month (more than my car payment) for insurance, I wouldnt be able to afford gas. (and sometimes food)

but it got me $3k off my jeep so I guess it was kinda worth it.

the reason insurance is so high is this----anybody can buy one, and it does 167 mph. that is much faster than the stock brakes, tires, and suspension can handle. i did 155 and had to replace my pads the next day.
Similar situation here... Going from a Subaru WRX STI that is literally limited only by air drag at 172 mph. I got it up to about 160 at which point I think I saw an angel that said "are you stupid or something?" My insurance at 34 years old is not too bad... I think like 1000 a year comprehensive. If a car that teenagers like to wreck on a daily basis costs me that much I really hope the Jeep is cheaper!
01-27-2013 09:47 PM
Tweak
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeK46 View Post
Not surprised about the 350Z being #1.

I went from an 03 350Z, to a 13 JK, guess what happened to my insurance.

BTW I bought the Z when I was 19 and stupid. didnt do my research and I had no idea that after paying the $320 a month (more than my car payment) for insurance, I wouldnt be able to afford gas. (and sometimes food)

but it got me $3k off my jeep so I guess it was kinda worth it.

the reason insurance is so high is this----anybody can buy one, and it does 167 mph. that is much faster than the stock brakes, tires, and suspension can handle. i did 155 and had to replace my pads the next day.
01-27-2013 12:44 PM
teknoid
Quote:
Originally Posted by snochick View Post
I can attest to how well Wranglers tend to hold up in a wreck. On my old TJ at least.

Had a lady take a curve too tight while I was waiting to pull out of the gate from the AF base in England. She hit the front of my TJ on the Driver's side. That TJ's front bumper ripped a hole down the side of her car from front to back, and flung her rear bumper into a playground across the street. The only damage to my TJ was a busted fender flair and a bent corner on my bumper. Her car was totaled.

My passenger and I duct taped my fender flare back together, smacked the bumper with a sledge hammer a few times to get it away from the tire and continued to the BBQ we were going to. The cops thought it was hilarious when we pulled out the duct tape.
What's so hilarious? You had the only two tools needed to fix anything. Duct tape, and a hammer.
01-27-2013 12:35 PM
lstiltner Wow! This is reassuring I also expected my ins. to increase, going from a 2005 Grand Cherokee to a 2011 JKU, and to my surprise it decreased right at $40 per month!!
12-24-2012 10:19 AM
enjerhoo
Quote:
Originally Posted by j0nx View Post
Walter White would and I wouldn't mess with him over it.
Yeah but he upgraded to a hemi - 3 times I think.

Personally I would have found a Prius to burn to the ground though. Just MHO.
12-23-2012 11:27 PM
TJAnderson60 Did anyone else realize that that chart only accounts for driver deaths & not passenger deaths. At least that's what I assume since it specifically says "drivers".
12-23-2012 11:17 PM
Canadian GP My wife's car is 3rd highest, time for her to buy a JKU.
12-23-2012 02:22 PM
ed98208 Interesting that the 17 Wrangler deaths are all shown as single-vehicle and no rollover. This report of Wrangler injuries and deaths occurring from 2006-2011 shows that most of the incidents involved a rollover.
12-23-2012 02:11 PM
Panther57
Quote:
Originally Posted by TankinDem View Post
I bet overall, Jeep owners drive a bit slower and are considerably less susceptible to road rage since i've heard that Jeep owners are, as a whole, happier and enjoy life more than other car owners.

As for insurance rates being lower, it MUST be that wrangler owners are simply better drivers, and thus, cheaper to insure. Great to be in this group, as my rates also went with my 2012 JKU over my 2008 liberty.
I agree. I rarely make use of the extra juice in the Pentastar because I'm just not in a hurry to get where I'm going ...

And I sit up higher in my wrangler, which enables me to see past the cars ahead of me and anticipate when I might need to stop. And speaking about stopping, I really appreciate the engine braking in my wrangler that I think makes it a safer vehicle to drive on bad roads.

(just one last comment: I also wouldn't be caught dead in an Aztec)
12-23-2012 11:51 AM
HRR1
Quote:
Originally Posted by blw2000 View Post
It's OK to admit you bought one.
Oh! You must leave the forum immeadiately!
12-23-2012 08:48 AM
Bilge
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarsA View Post
Very interesting; thanks for posting that. It gets even scarier for Nissan Titan drivers when you add up their 3 different types (crew, 2wd, 4wd), for a total of 329 deaths! I wonder if it's because most full-size V8 pick-up drivers drive like total douchebags, at least here in TX? But then Tundras, F-150s and Silverados should be represented on this list as well...

Anyway, I'm happy with my choice!
I was starting to be a little annoyed then I saw you qualify the statement with the V8.
12-22-2012 04:00 PM
MikeK46 Not surprised about the 350Z being #1.
12-22-2012 01:06 PM
dluber Thanks for sharing. I'm glad to see the Wrangler(s) are on the safer side.
12-22-2012 12:07 PM
Con Artist
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkjeeper06 View Post
I kind of expected them to be that low. When properly seat belted and when not hitting things like deer and moose that come thru the windshield, people really only die in really bad crashes. Rollovers are an example of this. With such a strong roll cage, my co-worker was tboned by a drunk driver, rolled 7 times, and still walked away from the crash without injuries. The weight of the vehicle, heavy duty frame, and lack of a large crumple zone can also help by transferring more of the crash's energy into the other car rather than the jeep. My dad always said if you have 6,000 pounds going one way, it's going to take a lot to make it stop it change directions. I know it's not totally true but at least partially

I'm glad the rates are so low tho. That's reassuring
Remember Junior Seau? Before he successfully offed himself earlier this year, he made an attempt in 2007 by driving off a 100 ft cliff. He said he fell asleep at the wheel, but I don't quite believe him...
12-22-2012 11:59 AM
Amfivena I'd like to point out that the chart is deaths per million registered vehicle years. Which means for every million JKs registered for a full year, around 17 people died in them. A zero doesn't mean no one died, it likely means less than .5 people died per million vehicles. Otherwise we'd be inundated with NOBODY EVER DIES IN OUR CAR advertisements.

The interesting question for Jeeps is those statistics lump TJs and JKs together (model years 2005-2008). What will figures for JKs only look like?
12-22-2012 03:46 AM
Deepjeep1371
Insurance

Came out of a 2008 Toyota Double Cab 4 wheel drive into a 2012 jku and my insurance actually went down several bucks. I heard that rates also have to do with parts availability as well.
12-22-2012 02:34 AM
dylan1991
Quote:
Originally Posted by snochick View Post
I can attest to how well Wranglers tend to hold up in a wreck. On my old TJ at least.

Had a lady take a curve too tight while I was waiting to pull out of the gate from the AF base in England. She hit the front of my TJ on the Driver's side. That TJ's front bumper ripped a hole down the side of her car from front to back, and flung her rear bumper into a playground across the street. The only damage to my TJ was a busted fender flair and a bent corner on my bumper. Her car was totaled.

My passenger and I duct taped my fender flare back together, smacked the bumper with a sledge hammer a few times to get it away from the tire and continued to the BBQ we were going to. The cops thought it was hilarious when we pulled out the duct tape.

This is why I always carry a roll of duct tape with me. You never when your going to need it, and there really isn't anything that can't be fixed with enough duct tape


In response to the OP.. Interesting statistics! It's nice to know we all drive some of the safest vehicles on the road. I know when I'm in my Jeep, I don't accerlerate hard, I never make the speed limit unless its under 55, and overall I just drive more cautious than I do in my car. I know I'm not the only person that drives my Jeep this way, and I'm sure this plays a big part in keeping the death rates down in Jeeps.
12-09-2012 08:00 PM
snochick I can attest to how well Wranglers tend to hold up in a wreck. On my old TJ at least.

Had a lady take a curve too tight while I was waiting to pull out of the gate from the AF base in England. She hit the front of my TJ on the Driver's side. That TJ's front bumper ripped a hole down the side of her car from front to back, and flung her rear bumper into a playground across the street. The only damage to my TJ was a busted fender flair and a bent corner on my bumper. Her car was totaled.

My passenger and I duct taped my fender flare back together, smacked the bumper with a sledge hammer a few times to get it away from the tire and continued to the BBQ we were going to. The cops thought it was hilarious when we pulled out the duct tape.
12-09-2012 03:56 PM
Lusus_Naturae When we started thinking about trading in my TJ, I was a bit worried about the insurance. I was already used to being spoiled by the low rate on the TJ, so I knew I'd see an increase just because it was a newer vehicle. Keeping the same coverage, the insurance went up $4 a month!!

All I can figure is the new airbag system (mine has the side airbags too) and the new traction control features, and antilock brakes, etc make the newer JKU safer than my TJ.

I also would think the driver makes a difference too. As Jeep owners in general don't make as many claims. We hit a deer and look at the bent in the fender (think TJ) as an excuse to upgrade to flatties and beefier control arms and suspension. Dent the rear tub corner, time for armored corner protection and flush tail lights. We don't run to the insurance company to get it fixed to stock spec.

Also, for those of us, myself included, that have bought newer Jeeps, we 'grew up' driving some very simple vehicles. As mentioned above, my 2005 TJ, didn't have anti-lock brakes, traction control, heated mirrors, TPMS, or steering wheel controls (other then cruise). I enjoyed not having so much technology in my Jeep, I thrived on knowing there wasn't something to break. I now also enjoy having the top off and not being blinded at all because of the auto dimming rear view mirror. I am glad I learned to drive in bad weather with the TJ, I feel a bit bad my son may drive most of his life not knowing how to really drive without all the computer brains correcting tire speed and braking for you.
12-09-2012 12:12 PM
fljeepleo
Quote:
Originally Posted by j0nx View Post
Walter White would and I wouldn't mess with him over it.
This is true!
12-09-2012 12:05 PM
blw2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by onetraveller View Post
The Pontiac Aztek certainly isn't the prettiest car GM ever put out. And they had a hard time selling them.

However, not including aesthetics, if you look at the current explosion of cross-over type vehicles that try to do it all, I would have to say that the Aztek was ahead of it's time. It's looks (at least for the later models) do fit in fairly well with current designs.

To bad it was ugly as sin.

Mike
It's OK to admit you bought one.
12-09-2012 12:14 AM
onetraveller The Pontiac Aztek certainly isn't the prettiest car GM ever put out. And they had a hard time selling them.

However, not including aesthetics, if you look at the current explosion of cross-over type vehicles that try to do it all, I would have to say that the Aztek was ahead of it's time. It's looks (at least for the later models) do fit in fairly well with current designs.

To bad it was ugly as sin.

Mike
12-08-2012 07:55 PM
BeyondYourFrontDoor
Quote:
Originally Posted by cavsvet74 View Post
Every single time someone died in an Acura MDX it was a single vehicle roll over.
Another statistical weirdness...
12-08-2012 07:43 PM
michael305 i think its because we are good drivers, and jeeps have roll bars and were big, so we do more damage to other cars then to us. i think
12-08-2012 06:49 PM
cavsvet74 Every single time someone died in an Acura MDX it was a single vehicle roll over.
12-08-2012 06:02 PM
BlueLesPaul2006 Glad to see that Jeep is so well represented for safe vehicles.
12-08-2012 05:48 PM
StumpMT
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.L. View Post
Missing from the list is the Pontiac Aztec. NOBODY would be caught dead in one of those...
I seriously have tears in my eyes from this LOL
12-08-2012 05:44 PM
chrisfp88
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeyondYourFrontDoor
What is interesting is ALL the JKU deaths were single vehicle...

That is statistically crazy.
Actually not very. The chart doesn't specify on road or off. Therefore it could be that several were on rural roads or trails.
12-08-2012 05:31 PM
johnnybravow i had a 2005 duramax and my 2011 jk is 60$ cheaper a month. it just made me that much happier to be a jeep owner
This thread has more than 30 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 PM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC