Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > General Jeep Discussions > Tires & Wheels > Mickey Thompson Classic III Compared to Classic II

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: Mickey Thompson Classic III Compared to Classic II Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
01-06-2014 12:58 PM
MudMinnow I'm no spokesman for Mickey Thompson, but the holes on A set of 17in Classic IIs I saw on a JK had much bigger holes than my 15in Classic IIs.
12-27-2013 05:47 PM
Holton345 I am bumping this old thread because it deserves some comment by any who actually know from firsthand experience with the Classic II and Classic III rims.

I too would like to know what the specific differences are. I have the Classic Locks that are pretty old, so they are probably based on the Classic II. I *hate* the fake bling-bling beadlock ring. However, the way they stick out from beneath the flare (3 5/8" backspacing) and the overall shape are very attractive to me. I really wish I could find a set of Classic IIs for my TJ. I like the Classic IIIs, I guess, but not the bigger holes.

Are the hole sizes based on rim size? Did the Classic IIs in 17" also have larger holes? Do the Classic IIIs in 15" have smaller holes?

Any MT reps on this forum?
03-21-2013 03:33 PM
MudMinnow
Mickey Thompson Classic III Compared to Classic II

I ordered a set of 4 Mickey Thompson Classic IIs about a year and a half ago. I wanted to finally have a full size spare, so it was time to order another wheel, and put the extra 31 I had on it. They don't sell Classic IIs anymore, now it is the Classic III. I looked on the forum to see if there were any differences between the two other than price. I saw something about a higher load rating, but I don't know if that true. To me it seems like the back spacing and offset are the same as the classic ii, but there is a difference in the appearance of the wheel. The 8 holes in the wheel, which give it that classic look, are significantly bigger on the Classic IIIs. I remember when I got my Classic IIs, and I was a bit disappointed at the size of the holes. The picture that 4wd.com and quadratec had on their websites for the Classic II showed the 17" wheel, and the holes on the 15" wheel are much smaller. I like the Classic III look better.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 AM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC