Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ Tech Forum > Some Help Please

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: Some Help Please Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
01-24-2010 05:13 PM
PaulRevere1991 x2 on finding a rubicon tj or lj,
if you can afford one you will not regret it, and it will save you any upgrades you want in the future(lockers,gears,D44 axle)
01-24-2010 12:29 PM
debruins ^ disagree^ i have a 97 and have not run into any problems at all, there are only minor differences in the body shape, and any mod that most people do that is different for a 97 any company will carry.
01-24-2010 11:57 AM
blackjeep51 Find an affordale '98 to '06 Rubicon. Many thousands of neede upgrades stock (Dana 44 axles, cv style driveshaft in rear, lockers, 4.0 low range) I say '98 not '97 (I have a '97) since there are a lot of after market parts that are different and sometimes not available for the '97.
01-24-2010 11:10 AM
debruins It all depends on what your plans are. If you plan to just mildly offroad it and not modify it much and daily drive it, then the new Jk would be better. If you plan to go off road a good amount i would recommend finding a 97-06 (TJ) rubicon that has not been offroaded (check for scratches in the underbody paint). Also don't be afraid to use craigslist, you will get a MUCH better price than a stupid dealer.
01-24-2010 10:06 AM
Bobthegod They ALL sound good, but pics is where it's at. Post some photos will help a lot to decide also. But just for the sake of things I'd go with the '05, take the extra money and modify it to your hearts content. Because no matter which one you get YOU will not be able to keep your hand and imagination for changing/adding just a few things. Once you buy one it's a disease......You Will See!!!
01-23-2010 10:32 PM
4Jeepn 1st I would figure out what you can afford. Then from there decide which you like best. Both are fine. The new engine is fine as it as been used in mini vans for a long long time. Also see if you can find a used rubicon TJ in your area I have seen them for 12-15k around here, that would be my pick.
01-23-2010 10:20 PM
TJRP most say the 4.0 in the 2005 is a better engine. It is tried and true. The 3.8 in the 2008 and 2010 haven't seen the same amount of abuse over the years so they don't have the reputation of the 4.0 yet. Both engines will get between 15 and 20 mpg. The TJ(2005) will be a little cheaper to modify and is a good deal for only 12,500. It is not as wide as the JK(2008 and 2010) so it will fit on the trails a little better. Both Jeep models have a similar transmission if auto (4 speed) if manual I believe they are both 6 speed. I would go for the 2005, but I'm biased. Good Luck, let us know what you get.
01-23-2010 09:00 PM
gajeepdawg Personally I like the looks of the TJ's a little more. Not sure about how the engines compare though. But if its between choice two and three, I would go with choice two, unless you plan on a whole heck of a lot of upgrades anyway. Good luck.
01-23-2010 08:45 PM
RubiJK12 Once you make your decision, any of them will be great. And it depends what you might want to do with it and how you are going to use it.


If you are just looking for a driver, I would look at NEW, maybe 0% financing now available so payment would be less than the used. And you have all those warranties.
If you are going to build it and use it off road, warranty doesn't matter so much and all would need many of the same modifications. On thought, the painted fenders on the Sahara can catch brush, etc. and get the "arizona penstripes" if you leave them on. All is all, on a budget, new with 0% financing and warranty might be my thought.
Good luck and remember, they are all Jeeps and you'll love it.
01-23-2010 08:21 PM
indosurf Sorry, 6 cyl

Is the new engine Good?
01-23-2010 08:17 PM
stevens243 Gonna need some more info: What engine in the 05?
01-23-2010 08:09 PM
indosurf
Some Help Please

New to this, and did a little looking around.

Which One?

1. 2005 Wrangler X, 20k miles, softtop, stock. $12,500

2. 2008 Sahara 26k miles, softtop, stock. $20,000

3. Dealer said with rebates, a base 2010 for $20,000??

Money is an issue, and would prefer the lower payment, but if it's the much wiser thing to do, than I would consider a higher payment.

Drove the 2008 Sahara auto today, and it was awesome. Handeled and accelerated great. It felt more truck like, than I thought it would. Felt great looking out over the hood It was also a little cush with all the features, and great stereo. Did a little "wheelin" in a big empty parking lot. with plenty of barriers and curbs. I'm hooked.

Is the new engine better? Reliable?

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.



Jeep, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC