|05-11-2007 05:01 PM|
|05-11-2007 02:48 PM|
Well then thats that Jerry if there was a dyno test hen thats all there is to it no more no less. I personally wouldn't spend the money on an intake for my Jeep because as you stated it doesn't look restrictive at all. I would like a snorkel for performence but only becasue water don't compress and I like to test my Jeep fording abilities and have had a few close calls.
|05-11-2007 01:33 PM|
|JCS05Rubi||Daddy says no, Ive been taught to say yessir|
|05-11-2007 01:29 PM|
I'm just one that, over years of an interest in TB spacers and air intakes for the 4.0L engine, has a strong personal opinion that neither do squat for the 4.0L engine. They certainly can in many other vehicles like the Mustang 5.0L engine that has a restrictive air intake system but the TJ's is very free breathing from the factory. Really, it is.
Maybe 6 months before the Rubicons hit the dealers, I got a call from the Jeep engineer who is accepted as the "father" of the Rubicon, Jim Repp. While I had him on the phone, I asked him about the 4.0L's air intake design. Jim laughed and said he knew about all the discussions about aftermarket air intakes but confirmed they specifically designed the OE air intake to be totally non-restrictive. He also said while aftermarket air intakes and spacers (but only under carburetors) can help many cars, they really won't help the TJ's 4.0L engine. Jim has been with Jeep since AMC days and drives a CJ himself. At least he specifically confirmed what I had felt for years, that all those aftermarket TB spacers and air intake kits only help those with a strong suceptibility to the placebo affect.
|05-11-2007 01:18 PM|
|Mike001||What do you think is a realistic number?|
|05-11-2007 01:16 PM|
|05-11-2007 01:13 PM|
|Mike001||Because 2-3 just seemed low even though thats kinda what was on my mind. But with a TB and a good intake its possible.|
|05-11-2007 01:09 PM|
|05-11-2007 01:00 PM|
|Mike001||The only way you can actually know if it works would be a dyno test and just by the shear nature of the engine and what you are doing to it I would say you might get like7-10 horsepower from the intake which is a negligable gain. YOu would need a full exhaust to truly benefit from increasing intake into the engine. You also have to be able to get that extra air out better.|
|05-11-2007 12:41 PM|
|foxinthemudd||up here in oregon we do alot of mud, as much as I love rock climbing there isn't a whole lot of it around this area. but if I ever want to go out and get totally covered in the gooey stuff I can, so this is what our primary wheeling is at least in my area.|
|05-11-2007 09:00 AM|
|JCS05Rubi||could help the 4cyls in the mud where WOT is seen at times, and power is vital. but intakes/tbs are a waste of money unless you need a snorkel for deep water/mud|
|05-11-2007 08:06 AM|
|05-11-2007 01:19 AM|
|05-11-2007 01:04 AM|
As far as the AEM intake and TB spacer. I have one on mine, but I got it free from AEM. That's the only reason I have it on there at all. I didn't notice any performance gains from either mod.
I've been thinking of running my jeep at a local dyno shop just for the hell of it. I think when I do I'm gonna run one pass with the TBS and Intake and then run a pass with the stock intake and see if there's any difference.
|05-11-2007 12:55 AM|
|05-11-2007 12:31 AM|
|AzTJ||niether... they are one of those things that you buy just to say you got one.|
|05-10-2007 11:57 PM|
|foxinthemudd||ok so we all have some mixed feelings about the TB but equal about the TBS. what about the AEM intake? I'm going to do the 4.0 install do I need to find the intake tube to fit the 4.0 or the 2.5? is the AEM a good mod or should I go with a snorkel? .02 cents?|
|05-10-2007 06:28 PM|
|Jerry Bransford||Though quoting Jp Magazine is like the UN quoting the National Enquirer, they recently tried a 4.0 TB on a 2.5L and they didn't notice any difference either. The only time such a mod could make any difference anyway would be at extremely high RPMs at wide-open throttle, the only time it could ever use a little more air. You'd have to be a quarter-mile racer for any slight benefit, if at all. At least in my personal opinion.|
|05-10-2007 06:13 PM|
Sorry Jerry, gotta disagree partially with you. The spacer will not make a difference, there I agree. The 4.0 TB on a 2.5 TB will make a difference, though small. You are allowing more air to pass through the 4.0 TB which has a larger bore. Hence, a slight incease in power.
A friend of mine heard about the mod and aquired a 4.0 TB. Since his Jeep was in the shop, We tried it out on mine. Used a hill (paved road, speed limit 55) and maintained speed until having to downshift. After putting on the 4.0 TB, Jeep felt a little peppier. Ran same road, replicating test. Downshift point was almost 100 yards farther down the road.
Though this test is not very scientific, I do believe the 4.0 TB on a 2.5 will provide a slight increase in top end performance.
Just my .02 worth.
|05-10-2007 12:27 PM|
|Jerry Bransford||My crystal ball says you will notice........ nothing after installing either of those. Unless in the unlikely possibilty you are suceptible to the placebo effect.|
|05-10-2007 08:57 AM|
|compshooter||Well, I am assuming that you have the 2.5 engine, hence the 4.0 TB install. As for that install, forgo the spacer. Just bolt on the 4.0 TB and you'll notice a top end improvement.|
|05-10-2007 04:47 AM|
AEM Brute force
Ok so I have been thinking about going one of two routes, either the AEM Brute force air intake, or the Snorkel route. now I have some questions about this before I make up my mind on which one I want to run with.
1. what is involved in running/installing a snorkel kit? I've heard that if you want to play tug boat that a lot of sealing is needed (engine wise).
2. I live in Oregon so it rains a ton what would this do if I had a snorkel sucking in rain while I'm driving?
3. I'm going to be installing a 4.0L TB w/spacer. if I upgraded to either of these do I need to go with the 4.0L model or just stick with the 2.5L?