Jeep Wrangler Forum - Reply to Topic
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ Jeep Wrangler Forum > TJ General Discussion Forum > AEM Brute force

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Thread: AEM Brute force Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Wrangler Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
05-11-2007 05:01 PM
foxinthemudd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike001 View Post
The only way you can actually know if it works would be a dyno test and just by the shear nature of the engine and what you are doing to it I would say you might get like7-10 horsepower from the intake which is a negligable gain. YOu would need a full exhaust to truly benefit from increasing intake into the engine. You also have to be able to get that extra air out better.
I do have a full exhaust header pacesetter catback flowmaster. I only have the 2.5L, so all this talk about the 4.0L doesn't really apply to me. I just want to get a little more power and keep the engine cooler with my experiance in air intakes I can keep it cooler at least and have a better sounding rig all at the same time.
05-11-2007 02:48 PM
Mike001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford View Post
Some magazine (I think it was 4Wheel Drive & Sport Utility) ran a dyno test with a TB spacer and the best they could say was perhaps 1 hp. And at the HP levels being tested, that 1 hp amount of change could be equally attributed to everything from test tolerances to a minor RPM difference.

I'm just one that, over years of an interest in TB spacers and air intakes for the 4.0L engine, has a strong personal opinion that neither do squat for the 4.0L engine. They certainly can in many other vehicles like the Mustang 5.0L engine that has a restrictive air intake system but the TJ's is very free breathing from the factory. Really, it is.

Maybe 6 months before the Rubicons hit the dealers, I got a call from the Jeep engineer who is accepted as the "father" of the Rubicon, Jim Repp. While I had him on the phone, I asked him about the 4.0L's air intake design. Jim laughed and said he knew about all the discussions about aftermarket air intakes but confirmed they specifically designed the OE air intake to be totally non-restrictive. He also said while aftermarket air intakes and spacers (but only under carburetors) can help many cars, they really won't help the TJ's 4.0L engine. Jim has been with Jeep since AMC days and drives a CJ himself. At least he specifically confirmed what I had felt for years, that all those aftermarket TB spacers and air intake kits only help those with a strong suceptibility to the placebo affect.

Well then thats that Jerry if there was a dyno test hen thats all there is to it no more no less. I personally wouldn't spend the money on an intake for my Jeep because as you stated it doesn't look restrictive at all. I would like a snorkel for performence but only becasue water don't compress and I like to test my Jeep fording abilities and have had a few close calls.
05-11-2007 01:33 PM
JCS05Rubi Daddy says no, Ive been taught to say yessir
05-11-2007 01:29 PM
Jerry Bransford
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike001 View Post
What do you think is a realistic number?
Some magazine (I think it was 4Wheel Drive & Sport Utility) ran a dyno test with a TB spacer and the best they could say was perhaps 1 hp. And at the HP levels being tested, that 1 hp amount of change could be equally attributed to everything from test tolerances to a minor RPM difference.

I'm just one that, over years of an interest in TB spacers and air intakes for the 4.0L engine, has a strong personal opinion that neither do squat for the 4.0L engine. They certainly can in many other vehicles like the Mustang 5.0L engine that has a restrictive air intake system but the TJ's is very free breathing from the factory. Really, it is.

Maybe 6 months before the Rubicons hit the dealers, I got a call from the Jeep engineer who is accepted as the "father" of the Rubicon, Jim Repp. While I had him on the phone, I asked him about the 4.0L's air intake design. Jim laughed and said he knew about all the discussions about aftermarket air intakes but confirmed they specifically designed the OE air intake to be totally non-restrictive. He also said while aftermarket air intakes and spacers (but only under carburetors) can help many cars, they really won't help the TJ's 4.0L engine. Jim has been with Jeep since AMC days and drives a CJ himself. At least he specifically confirmed what I had felt for years, that all those aftermarket TB spacers and air intake kits only help those with a strong suceptibility to the placebo affect.
05-11-2007 01:18 PM
Mike001 What do you think is a realistic number?
05-11-2007 01:16 PM
Jerry Bransford
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike001 View Post
Because 2-3 just seemed low even though thats kinda what was on my mind. But with a TB and a good intake its possible.
Well, I guess we can agree that we have different opinions on how much gain is realistically possible then.
05-11-2007 01:13 PM
Mike001 Because 2-3 just seemed low even though thats kinda what was on my mind. But with a TB and a good intake its possible.
05-11-2007 01:09 PM
Jerry Bransford
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike001 View Post
I would say you might get like7-10 horsepower from the intake .
How did you arrive at that estimate for a TJ? While I would agree that amount of gain is very realistic for many cars, I don't believe a TJ engine will gain anything even close to that amount.
05-11-2007 01:00 PM
Mike001 The only way you can actually know if it works would be a dyno test and just by the shear nature of the engine and what you are doing to it I would say you might get like7-10 horsepower from the intake which is a negligable gain. YOu would need a full exhaust to truly benefit from increasing intake into the engine. You also have to be able to get that extra air out better.
05-11-2007 12:41 PM
foxinthemudd up here in oregon we do alot of mud, as much as I love rock climbing there isn't a whole lot of it around this area. but if I ever want to go out and get totally covered in the gooey stuff I can, so this is what our primary wheeling is at least in my area.
05-11-2007 09:00 AM
JCS05Rubi could help the 4cyls in the mud where WOT is seen at times, and power is vital. but intakes/tbs are a waste of money unless you need a snorkel for deep water/mud
05-11-2007 08:06 AM
compshooter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford View Post
The only time such a mod could make any difference anyway would be at extremely high RPMs at wide-open throttle, the only time it could ever use a little more air. You'd have to be a quarter-mile racer for any slight benefit, if at all. At least in my personal opinion.
That was basically what our test was. 5th gear, pedal in the floor to see when we would have to downshift. Made it 100 yards farther before the downshift, so as you said, the wide-open throttle is where the benifit can be noticed. So it seems that we are both agreeing (up to a point) that this mod does help on the top end (wide open).
05-11-2007 01:19 AM
Jerry Bransford
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1BLKJP View Post
Jerry you gotta stop stealing Blaine's quotes bud.
It was so good I couldn't help it.
05-11-2007 01:04 AM
1BLKJP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford View Post
Though quoting Jp Magazine is like the UN quoting the National Enquirer, they recently tried a 4.0 TB on a 2.5L and they didn't notice any difference either.
Jerry you gotta stop stealing Blaine's quotes bud.

As far as the AEM intake and TB spacer. I have one on mine, but I got it free from AEM. That's the only reason I have it on there at all. I didn't notice any performance gains from either mod.

I've been thinking of running my jeep at a local dyno shop just for the hell of it. I think when I do I'm gonna run one pass with the TBS and Intake and then run a pass with the stock intake and see if there's any difference.
05-11-2007 12:55 AM
Jerry Bransford
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxinthemudd View Post
is the AEM a good mod or should I go with a snorkel? .02 cents?
Is neither an option?
05-11-2007 12:31 AM
AzTJ niether... they are one of those things that you buy just to say you got one.
05-10-2007 11:57 PM
foxinthemudd ok so we all have some mixed feelings about the TB but equal about the TBS. what about the AEM intake? I'm going to do the 4.0 install do I need to find the intake tube to fit the 4.0 or the 2.5? is the AEM a good mod or should I go with a snorkel? .02 cents?
05-10-2007 06:28 PM
Jerry Bransford Though quoting Jp Magazine is like the UN quoting the National Enquirer, they recently tried a 4.0 TB on a 2.5L and they didn't notice any difference either. The only time such a mod could make any difference anyway would be at extremely high RPMs at wide-open throttle, the only time it could ever use a little more air. You'd have to be a quarter-mile racer for any slight benefit, if at all. At least in my personal opinion.
05-10-2007 06:13 PM
compshooter Sorry Jerry, gotta disagree partially with you. The spacer will not make a difference, there I agree. The 4.0 TB on a 2.5 TB will make a difference, though small. You are allowing more air to pass through the 4.0 TB which has a larger bore. Hence, a slight incease in power.

A friend of mine heard about the mod and aquired a 4.0 TB. Since his Jeep was in the shop, We tried it out on mine. Used a hill (paved road, speed limit 55) and maintained speed until having to downshift. After putting on the 4.0 TB, Jeep felt a little peppier. Ran same road, replicating test. Downshift point was almost 100 yards farther down the road.

Though this test is not very scientific, I do believe the 4.0 TB on a 2.5 will provide a slight increase in top end performance.

Just my .02 worth.
05-10-2007 12:27 PM
Jerry Bransford My crystal ball says you will notice........ nothing after installing either of those. Unless in the unlikely possibilty you are suceptible to the placebo effect.
05-10-2007 08:57 AM
compshooter Well, I am assuming that you have the 2.5 engine, hence the 4.0 TB install. As for that install, forgo the spacer. Just bolt on the 4.0 TB and you'll notice a top end improvement.
05-10-2007 04:47 AM
foxinthemudd
AEM Brute force

Ok so I have been thinking about going one of two routes, either the AEM Brute force air intake, or the Snorkel route. now I have some questions about this before I make up my mind on which one I want to run with.

1. what is involved in running/installing a snorkel kit? I've heard that if you want to play tug boat that a lot of sealing is needed (engine wise).

2. I live in Oregon so it rains a ton what would this do if I had a snorkel sucking in rain while I'm driving?

3. I'm going to be installing a 4.0L TB w/spacer. if I upgraded to either of these do I need to go with the 4.0L model or just stick with the 2.5L?

ADVICE PLEASE!

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.



Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to Chrysler Motors LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with the Chrysler Motors LLC