me and my dad got our jeeps around the same time his is a 1989 mine is a 1995. his Jeep has a wider stance to it. is this normal for the year we are trying to figure out if it has different axles on it or not. his axel in the rear looks different than mine but I was not sure if this is just the year difference or if he had possibly a Dana 44 on is
05-15-2013 09:17 PM
05-15-2013 09:30 PM
If I'm not mistaken alot was changed in 1995 to the yjs. They have alot of tj similarities
05-15-2013 09:44 PM
Your wheels may have a different back spacing. :thumb:
05-15-2013 10:20 PM
like nubby said, its likely rim backspacing differences, even if someone did swap a different rear end in his.
05-15-2013 10:21 PM
The 89 if stock, has a non c-clip d35 and 10" drums while the 95 has 9" drums and c-clips. Do both have stock rims? If not, As was said. Probably a backspacing difference on the rims.
05-15-2013 10:36 PM
It's not the axles, it's just simply the rims. Unless you post a pic we won't know 100%
05-15-2013 11:31 PM
:dance:Dad's JEEP is badder it is a great 89
All the input above is great, post a few pics. Love to see them both
05-16-2013 01:18 AM
hey thanks for all the replies guys I'll get a bunch of pictures tomorrow morning
05-16-2013 11:23 AM
I know when I bought my High Steer kit from Rocky Road they sent me the wide track steering kit. The tie rod was too long to screw the tie rod ends in far enough to do the alignment. When I called them they told me pre-92' were wide track, and later than that were narrow track. Now I dont know if it is just for the tie rod, or if it also has to do with the actual axle itself. It is only a difference of about 1 1/2" though so most people would probably overlook it.