Tire Size Concerns? Weight vs. Diameter - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Jeep Wrangler Forum

Go Back   Jeep Wrangler Forum > General Jeep Discussions > Tires & Wheels

Join Wrangler Forum Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on WranglerForum.com
Old 12-20-2015, 02:06 PM
Thread Starter
  #1
Jeeper
 
barrydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 392
Tire Size Concerns? Weight vs. Diameter

I have read lots of posts about the issues related to large tires. I guess I am still confused as to what actually leads to the issues. Is it the diameter or the weight that causes the issues of a combination of both?

Thanks...

__________________
Barry
USMC
barrydd is offline   Quote
Old 12-20-2015, 03:46 PM   #2
Supporting Member

5-Year WF Supporting Member
 
jumplikeawillys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 397
Both lead to different issues. Weight hurts your mpg and can wear out components (ball joints, brakes etc) faster. The diameter and/or the width can rub on different suspension components depending on how you use your jeep. Plus for heavier tires you need an aftermarket tire carrier or run without one like I do. I just toss my spare in the back if I'm going some place far

jumplikeawillys is offline   Quote
Old 12-20-2015, 09:08 PM   #3
Jeeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 343
I was really confused on the whole tire thing for about a month. The diameter will screw with the speedometer so you need to recalculate what your actual speed/mileage will be. I recently got some new tires, and was so crazy over dropping weight at the wheels, wanting to add a few mpg and making the jeep feel lighter/more pep. I ended up buying some KO2's, E load which are 53#. Made my jeep ride really nice...yet I kept wondering how much better the lighter C load would do. I had to buy new 17" wheels to get C load tires. Ended up the same diameter as the other ones but a little bit wider.

Compared to the heavier E's, The C's were a softer/spongy feel with a lot more rolling resistance. I noticed immediately, how my foot had to push further on the skinny pedal to get the jeep going. I never seen my gas gauge move so fast. I went back to the 16" E load, and the mpg is markedly better. I don't think weight is a big deal as some seem to say. But the width and rolling resistance seemed to have a lot to do with it for my experiment.

I saw JP mag, do a comparison of the heaviest wheels and tires vs. the lightest 33's. The difference between the sets was over 30 lbs. and all that resulted was a few HP and .5 mpg diff. Was pretty shocked at such a small diff.
Jeff Allan is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off






All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Jeep®, Wrangler, Liberty, Wagoneer, Cherokee, Gladiator, Mopar and Grand Cherokee are copyrighted and trademarked to FCA US LLC.
Wranglerforum.com is not in any way associated with FCA US LLC.