Jeep Wrangler Forum banner

2003 tj vs 2007 jk

901 Views 6 Replies 6 Participants Last post by  Runt54
Hello fellow jeepers
I bought a 2 door tj about a year ago, it's a 2003 rubicon with the 4.0 I6 (80,000 miles)
Recently I've been thinking about upgrading for more space and for two more doors and a longer wheel base when crawling ect
The jk would be a 2007-8 with about 110k miles

What are you guys opinion's on the switch.
Keep the 2003 or upgrade to the 2007-8.
I don't know too much about the v6 pen star engine but I've herd good and bad responses to the crappy peppy ness in comparison to the I6
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
I would stay with the 03...my $.02
Agreed! The 3.6L in the 2007-2011 are horrible IMO. The TJ has easier upgrades and less electronics to mess up. Also the 4.0 will last you a while especially only with 80,000 miles.
The 3.6 pentastar engine isn't in the range of jeeps your considering. You are looking at 3.8 from '07-'11
Keep the tj.... Thats the first year of the rubicon with low miles im jealous nice buy
even though I am GENERALLY against a Rubi......(IMO most people don't need one, and the people that truly need one, need MORE than a RUBI)........but hey your Jeep/ your choice.......okay if ya still are following this train of thought.... I like my JKs...both of them....built after '11....with the Pentastar. IMO keep your RUBI until you can switch for a Pentastar/ '12 or newer....and yeah I had a TJ for 11years I can compare them.....GOOD LUCK!!!
The 3.6 pentastar engine isn't in the range of jeeps your considering. You are looking at 3.8 from '07-'11
Oh yes you are right. My bad! My dad had the 3.8 and the power just isn't there. The pentastar is amazing compared to the other.
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top