Anyone know who makes the lightest weight 37 with an aggressive tread pattern that sticks to rocks?
Good analogy, weight isn't what gets you, it's leverage. Weight will have an impact on your housing, unit bearings, flanges, ball joints, and Cs, but diameter is what will break your shafts and ring&pinion.Remember a 37 inch tire being "light" is deceiving. A 37 inch tire that weighs 68 pounds is not the same as a 32 inch tire that weighs 68 pounds. The 37 puts much more wear and tear/stress on parts.
Think of it this way: put a 10 pound weight in your hand and make a circular motion, not a big deal/easy. Now put a 10 pound weight in a two foot long tube sock and spin it around. Much different!
That analogy is only partially true. Swinging the sock at a greater distance becomes more difficult because it creates an out of balance condition. As with a round tire if you distributed the 10 lb weight evenly around the circumference then it would be a spinning disk that weighs 10 lbs, not that difficult. The problem IMHO, is the gyroscopic forces that are generated. Bigger wider heavier taller becomes a bigger and heavier gyroscope. The thing about gyroscopes are that they resist change of direction. Kind of the same principle with a flywheel. That's why all the steering components and bearings bushings etc. take such a beating. In the motorcycle world it is called unsprung weight. Unspung weight is the enemy of a good handling bike.Remember a 37 inch tire being "light" is deceiving. A 37 inch tire that weighs 68 pounds is not the same as a 32 inch tire that weighs 68 pounds. The 37 puts much more wear and tear/stress on parts. Think of it this way: put a 10 pound weight in your hand and make a circular motion, not a big deal/easy. Now put a 10 pound weight in a two foot long tube sock and spin it around. Much different!