Jeep Wrangler Forum banner

Is a 2000s Jeep Wrangler Sport good for off road?

4.9K views 11 replies 9 participants last post by  Tim63601  
#1 ·
Hello,

I am new to the Jeep world and off-roading. As a beginner, I'm looking to purchase an early 2000s Jeep Wrangler Sport that I can upgrade and use on minor trails. I want to know if the sport models are capable for mild off-roading and if any of you guys do drive one what should I be looking for when making a purchase. Thanks!
 
#3 ·
The Wrangler Sport is probably the most popular offroad vehicle ever, it can be made/modded to do any level of trail you could possibly want to do. It's ready for mild/moderate trails when stock, and with a suspension lift, tires, etc. can be turned into an absolute trail beast. Plenty of great aftermarket parts to help do that, most of which are bolt-on parts.

Personally I'd go for anything made from 1997 to 2004. My first was a '97 and after that one was stolen ten years ago I ended up with my present '04. 2005-6 models have potential issues that would keep them off my list of desirable years.

The below pics show the kind of trails the Wrangler is capable of... the red one was my '97 Wrangler, the black on is what I'm driving now.

A stock Wrangler can do trails that are tougher than many people have the nerve to even try so no worries with it doing minor trails. :)
 

Attachments

#4 ·
My personal favorite would be the '99 to '02 model, with the 4.0 straight six, 32rh transmission, with a Dana 44 in the back. The 4.0 straight six puts out more torque then the V-sixes used in the current Jeep lines, and are better suited for offroad use. The manual 5-speed transmission is fine, I've gotten used to the 32rh, and prefer it after having a CJ/YJ/TJ with manual transmissions. The Dana 44 is a stronger differential than the Dana 35 that equipped some Jeeps, but that's not to say the Dana 35 is a liability (unless you equip the Jeep with excessively large tires, and/or really start thrashing the Jeep). They can be upgraded and strengthened, but so can the Dana 44s, and the 44 is inherently stronger. The TJs are slightly smaller than the JKs and JLs, a plus offroad, and are less plasticky. They also have fewer of the onroad creature comforts the JKs and JLs have, meaning less street oriented gadgets to break and cause problems when you're out in the boonies. This is just my opinion, but these are my recommendations.
 
#6 ·
I have a '00 solar yellow sport that I've so far lightly modified and have done trails up to a 6-7ish with 33's no problem. I love my Jeep. I've seen a lot more sports on the roads than sahara or rubicons. Great vehicle to start with
 
#8 ·

Attachments

#10 ·
I had a '91 Renegade with a Dana 35. I know a lot of guys hated the early '90's Renegade package, but I liked it because it was different. I ran 31" BFGs, and never had any issues (and I ran it onroad and offroad all over Northern California). To qualify this, I have to be honest, I never took it rock crawling or mudding. The 4.0 engine doesn't make as much horsepower or torque as the current sixes, but it does make more torque at a lower rpm, as is inherent in a straight six versus a v six. This is a trait especially suited for an offroad vehicle. Street vehicles typically make more horsepower than torque, at higher rpms, and are better suited for street applications, as is the newer JK/JL v six. It comes down to low end grunt, which all Jeeps took advantage of, until the release of the JK/JL. I was a regional field engineer at the time for the Northern California IRS offices, and the Renegade was my daily driver. While it was paid for, I had no intention of thrashing on it hard enough to cause serious damage. It was fine for running through the more remote national forests for light camping and shooting. I thought about swapping out the Dana 35 for a Dana 44 on principal, but never got around to it, and finally traded it in '95 for a new turbo all wheel drive Eagle Talon. I was oncall a lot, and flying around the country so much, I just didn't have time to go camping or shooting for a few years. My point is, it depends on how you drive a Jeep with a Dana 35, and where you take it. There were a number of Jeeps sold with Dana 35s (take the X models for example), and not every Jeep equipped with a Dana 35 suffered a failure. I accept that some people had issues with them, but it depended largely on how you modified the Jeep, how you drove it, and where you ran it. I knew a guy that took a brand new Wrangler to the Rubicon the first weekend he got it, and scrapped off most of the right side on a boulder. He was fine with the damage, as "this is what I bought it for" he said. In my opinion, how you run your gear is your decision. It just depends on a) is it paid for b) is it your daily driver, and c) how hard are you on your equipment. I say this, because I think a new Jeeper should consider all these issues before getting themselves in over their head. Hey, I'm older, and aren't looking to upset anyone, but to someone that's justing getting their first Jeep, or into offroading in general, these are factors that should be taken into consideration while modifying their Jeep, and how difficult a terrain they decide to take on. Be smart, learn the art of offroading, and modify your Jeep the right way the first time around.
 
#11 ·
A 2000 Sport is damn fine Jeep, especially in Solar Yellow. Has served me well for the past 19 years. The 4.0L is a must. Auto or manual is your preference. My advice is start with the stock Jeep and see what it can do. You may be surprised how much they can do out the box. Upgrade as you break or find weak spots. Start with skid plates to protect what you have and go out enjoy the thing.